Bi-weekly is good for me; I'm in Seattle and just filled out the poll.

Great idea!


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com>wrote:

> +1, am in Seattle as well and would love to attend and be involved.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Ravi Mummulla <ravi.mummu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Good idea on recurring meetings. Im very interested in participating.
> > Biweekly works for me. I'm in Seattle (pacific) timezone - GMT-8.
> >
> > An agenda for the meetings ahead of time will help us get the most of our
> > time at the meetings.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > On Jun 12, 2013 6:23 AM, "Grant Ingersoll" <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Shannon Quinn <squ...@gatech.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Angel and Suneel, you may want to re-fill out the new doodle.
> >>>
> >>> FYI, this week won't be representative of my schedule; I'm in the last
> >> few weeks of a job at ORNL where I travel every weekend. Normally I'll
> have
> >> more flexibility than just 6pm on weeknights.
> >>
> >> Yeah, Doodle makes you pick dates, but I just want it to be
> representative
> >> a week long period of time and not tied to a specific set of dates.  So,
> >> just put in what your ideal times are in general and ignore the fact
> that
> >> it is set to next week.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 6/12/13 8:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> >>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Shannon Quinn <squ...@gatech.edu> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1, awesome idea
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One question: the poll, while set to GMT -5, does say it's in Central
> >> Time. Is this a daylight savings thing?
> >>>> I turned on Time Zone support, so not sure how it will look to others,
> >> but it sounds like it adjusts based on your location...  I see: 8 am,
> 10,
> >> 1, so on.
> >>>>
> >>>> I also realize, that I messed it up.  I meant 9 pm, not 9 am.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is the correct one: http://doodle.com/ymqaiwbh7khisnyv
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >> Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
> >> http://www.lucidworks.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to