I'd really like to, but had a trip come up.  If possible, can we push for one 
week?  Otherwise, if others want to go forward, I can try to set things up and 
share it w/ others.

On Jun 24, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Bhaskar Mookerji <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Is the Google hangouts dev session tomorrow/Tuesday still happening?
> 
> Lurkingly,
> Buro Mookerji
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> It seems to be that 6 pm ET is the consensus time for the majority of
>> people, although my having screwed up the poll didn't help.
>> 
>> Bi-weekly is the other consensus.  It also looks like Tuesday or Thursday
>> are the preferred dates.
>> 
>> I can't make next week, so I'm going to propose we kick off on Tuesday,
>> June 25 at 6 pm.  That will give us time to dry-run the Google Hangouts,
>> etc.
>> 
>> Again, just to be clear, the goal here is to work on the development of
>> Mahout, not to answer questions about how to run Mahout (we could do that
>> separately if there is a desire.)
>> 
>> I'll send out a reminder as we get closer.
>> 
>> -Grant
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I am from Northern Virginia, how many of us here are from the Washington
>> DC Metro area?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Jake Mannix <[email protected]>
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:56 PM
>>> Subject: Re: (Bi-)Weekly/Monthly Dev Sessions
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Wow, a lot of Seattleites, I should organize a Mahout MeetUp / Hackathon
>>> when I get back from europe at the end of the summer!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Bi-weekly is good for me; I'm in Seattle and just filled out the poll.
>>>> 
>>>> Great idea!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <[email protected]
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1, am in Seattle as well and would love to attend and be involved.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Ravi Mummulla <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Good idea on recurring meetings. Im very interested in participating.
>>>>>> Biweekly works for me. I'm in Seattle (pacific) timezone - GMT-8.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> An agenda for the meetings ahead of time will help us get the most of
>>>> our
>>>>>> time at the meetings.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> On Jun 12, 2013 6:23 AM, "Grant Ingersoll" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Shannon Quinn <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Angel and Suneel, you may want to re-fill out the new doodle.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> FYI, this week won't be representative of my schedule; I'm in the
>>>> last
>>>>>>> few weeks of a job at ORNL where I travel every weekend. Normally
>> I'll
>>>>> have
>>>>>>> more flexibility than just 6pm on weeknights.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yeah, Doodle makes you pick dates, but I just want it to be
>>>>> representative
>>>>>>> a week long period of time and not tied to a specific set of dates.
>>>>  So,
>>>>>>> just put in what your ideal times are in general and ignore the fact
>>>>> that
>>>>>>> it is set to next week.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 6/12/13 8:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Shannon Quinn <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1, awesome idea
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> One question: the poll, while set to GMT -5, does say it's in
>>>> Central
>>>>>>> Time. Is this a daylight savings thing?
>>>>>>>>> I turned on Time Zone support, so not sure how it will look to
>>>> others,
>>>>>>> but it sounds like it adjusts based on your location...  I see: 8 am,
>>>>> 10,
>>>>>>> 1, so on.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I also realize, that I messed it up.  I meant 9 pm, not 9 am.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Here is the correct one: http://doodle.com/ymqaiwbh7khisnyv
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
>>>>>>> http://www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>>  -jake
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------
>> Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
>> http://www.lucidworks.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
http://www.lucidworks.com





Reply via email to