It seems to be that 6 pm ET is the consensus time for the majority of people, although my having screwed up the poll didn't help.
Bi-weekly is the other consensus. It also looks like Tuesday or Thursday are the preferred dates. I can't make next week, so I'm going to propose we kick off on Tuesday, June 25 at 6 pm. That will give us time to dry-run the Google Hangouts, etc. Again, just to be clear, the goal here is to work on the development of Mahout, not to answer questions about how to run Mahout (we could do that separately if there is a desire.) I'll send out a reminder as we get closer. -Grant On Jun 12, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I am from Northern Virginia, how many of us here are from the Washington DC > Metro area? > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> > To: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:56 PM > Subject: Re: (Bi-)Weekly/Monthly Dev Sessions > > > Wow, a lot of Seattleites, I should organize a Mahout MeetUp / Hackathon > when I get back from europe at the end of the summer! > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Musselman < > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Bi-weekly is good for me; I'm in Seattle and just filled out the poll. >> >> Great idea! >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com >>> wrote: >> >>> +1, am in Seattle as well and would love to attend and be involved. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Ravi Mummulla <ravi.mummu...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Good idea on recurring meetings. Im very interested in participating. >>>> Biweekly works for me. I'm in Seattle (pacific) timezone - GMT-8. >>>> >>>> An agenda for the meetings ahead of time will help us get the most of >> our >>>> time at the meetings. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> On Jun 12, 2013 6:23 AM, "Grant Ingersoll" <gsing...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Shannon Quinn <squ...@gatech.edu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Angel and Suneel, you may want to re-fill out the new doodle. >>>>>> >>>>>> FYI, this week won't be representative of my schedule; I'm in the >> last >>>>> few weeks of a job at ORNL where I travel every weekend. Normally I'll >>> have >>>>> more flexibility than just 6pm on weeknights. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, Doodle makes you pick dates, but I just want it to be >>> representative >>>>> a week long period of time and not tied to a specific set of dates. >> So, >>>>> just put in what your ideal times are in general and ignore the fact >>> that >>>>> it is set to next week. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/12/13 8:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >>>>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Shannon Quinn <squ...@gatech.edu> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1, awesome idea >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One question: the poll, while set to GMT -5, does say it's in >> Central >>>>> Time. Is this a daylight savings thing? >>>>>>> I turned on Time Zone support, so not sure how it will look to >> others, >>>>> but it sounds like it adjusts based on your location... I see: 8 am, >>> 10, >>>>> 1, so on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also realize, that I messed it up. I meant 9 pm, not 9 am. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the correct one: http://doodle.com/ymqaiwbh7khisnyv >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>> Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers >>>>> http://www.lucidworks.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > > -jake -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers http://www.lucidworks.com
