Whatever works
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com>wrote: > I believe there was an announcement that went out last month about Apache > SF embracing github. - > http://jaxenter.com/apache-ups-github-integration-potential-49460.html > > Guess this is more of an INFRA task than anything we need to do (like the > recent setting up of svnpubsub for future releases). > > I can create an INFRA jira and wait for INFRA to take respond. > > > > > On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 6:03 PM, Andrew Musselman < > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One of my big wishlist items is to move Mahout to Github for workflow and > community features. > > I remember there being discussion a while back but is there any way to move > our Subversion repo to an Apache Git repo? > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I would like to start a conversation about where we want Mahout to be for > > 1.0. Let's suspend for the moment the question of how to achieve the > > goals. Instead, let's converge on what we really would like to have > happen > > and after that, let's talk about means that will get us there. > > > > Here are some goals that I think would be good in the area of numerics, > > classifiers and clustering: > > > > - runs with or without Hadoop > > > > - runs with or without map-reduce > > > > - includes (at least), regularized generalized linear models, k-means, > > random forest, distributed random forest, distributed neural networks > > > > - reasonably competitive speed against other implementations including > > graphlab, mlib and R. > > > > - interactive model building > > > > - models can be exported as code or data > > > > - simple programming model > > > > - programmable via Java or R > > > > - runs clustered or not > > > > > > What does everybody think? > > >
