the only problem is that we are not really requiring it. We are not using
anything of 1.7 functionality. If people compile (as i do) Mahout, they can
compile any bytecode version they want.

There are some 1.7 artifact dependencies in H20 but 1.7 would be required
at run time only and only if the people are actually using h2obindings as
dependency (which i expect majority would not care for).


On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> wrote:

> As far as I can tell there should be no problems with declaring Java 1.7
> as the official minimum Java version for building and running Mahout.  Are
> there any objections to this or problems that I am missing?
>
> Andy
>

Reply via email to