oracle?
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:54:43 -0700 > Subject: Re: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > or testing. > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My current java is 1.6.0_38, i have no problem building. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Andrew Palumbo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> you're right- my big concern is that on our (probably outdated) building > >> from source page we have 1.6 listed: > >> > >> http://mahout.apache.org/developers/buildingmahout.html > >> > >> The obvious simple fix here is to make the quick change on the webpage to > >> 1.7 in order to build and test successfully. > >> > >> I do remember something about being limited to our current lucene version > >> though by 1.6 so i am wondering if this is may be a good time to push or > >> require 1.7. > >> > >> Just checking our bases, so I'll drop it if there's no problem here. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:33:19 -0700 > >> > Subject: Re: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout > >> > From: [email protected] > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > > >> > the only problem is that we are not really requiring it. We are not > >> using > >> > anything of 1.7 functionality. If people compile (as i do) Mahout, they > >> can > >> > compile any bytecode version they want. > >> > > >> > There are some 1.7 artifact dependencies in H20 but 1.7 would be > >> required > >> > at run time only and only if the people are actually using h2obindings > >> as > >> > dependency (which i expect majority would not care for). > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Palumbo <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > As far as I can tell there should be no problems with declaring Java > >> 1.7 > >> > > as the official minimum Java version for building and running Mahout. > >> Are > >> > > there any objections to this or problems that I am missing? > >> > > > >> > > Andy > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >
