Sure, those would be options. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Question, is there a way to introduce PMML with using a more lightweight > format like yaml or json? > > > Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:25:29 -0800 > > Subject: Re: PMML > > From: andrew.mussel...@gmail.com > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > > > > Yes, the limitations are often an issue for people doing things that > aren't > > in the PMML spec yet; there could be room for suggesting new features in > > the spec by building them though, I suppose. > > > > Also agree that XML is a lousy/bloated way of representing stuff like > this, > > but in the end it's just a choice of representation so there may be > reason > > to use some other encoding and then provide an XML-export function. > > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I am willing to +1 any contribution at this point. > > > > > > my previous company used pmml to serialize simple stuff, but i don't > > > have first hand experience. Its flexibility is ultimately pretty > > > limited, isn't it? And xml is ultimately a media which is too ugly and > > > too verbose at the same time to represent models with any more or less > > > decent number of parameters? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > It makes sense to support PMML for classification and clustering > tasks to > > > > be able to share and distribute trained models. Sean, Pat, Dmitriy > and > > > Ted > > > > please chime in. > > > > > > > > PMML support in Mahout was talked about for a long time now but never > > > > really got any traction to take off. > > > > > > > > +1 to build this. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Musselman < > > > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> How much interest is there in a mahout-pmml module, with a starting > > > point > > > >> to be able to export a few analytic/scoring jobs to PMML > representation? > > > >> > > > >> I've seen a lot of interest at in being able to use PMML to > translate > > > >> analytic work into production(though I think people talk about it > more > > > than > > > >> they do it), and it could be a benchmark as part of a "definition of > > > done" > > > >> for any existing/new method we include since there's a spec to > build to. > > > >> > > > >> Best > > > >> Andrew > > > >> > > > > >
