i thought we wanted to do 0.10.1 with a quicker release cycle and bugfixes?
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello team, > > > > Should next version be 0.10.1 or 0.11.0? > > > > I am fine with just 0.11 > > > > > > Thinking maybe 0.11.0 is more suitable, if it's going to contain artifact > > name changes like MAHOUT-1680 and MAHOUT-1681, and fundamental new > > features, so we keep minor releases for backward compatible bug fix > > releases only. > > > > Btw, it would be good (whoever has privileges) to have versions in JIRA > > project sorted out: > > - mark 0.10.0 as released > > - remove two empty 1.0-snapshot versions > > - move 1.0 to the top and clear its release date > > - move 0.10.1/0.11.0 under 1.0 and after 0.10.0 > > > > Stevo, u should have permissions now to fix all of the above. > > > > - maybe plan and set 0.10.1/0.11.0 expected release date (Suneel was > > mentioning it would be nice to integrate with Apache Flink by October > > timely for http://lanyrd.com/2015/flink-forward/ ) > > > > This would definitely be a good story to present at > http://lanyrd.com/2015/flink-forward/ > > The Flink team is ready to dedicate resources from their camp to work with > us. > > > > Kind regards, > > Stevo Slavic. > > >
