I'm on a plane then but am okay going along with consensus. On Monday, April 13, 2015, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> wrote:
> 1 PM eastern is good for me. > > On 04/13/2015 10:44 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > >> We should talk about this. Could the team "slack" tomorrow 1PM Eastern >> Time >> to talk this out and also finalize scope for the next one? >> >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> i thought we wanted to do 0.10.1 with a quicker release cycle and >>> bugfixes? >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello team, >>>>> >>>>> Should next version be 0.10.1 or 0.11.0? >>>>> >>>>> I am fine with just 0.11 >>>> >>>> >>>> Thinking maybe 0.11.0 is more suitable, if it's going to contain >>>>> >>>> artifact >>> >>>> name changes like MAHOUT-1680 and MAHOUT-1681, and fundamental new >>>>> features, so we keep minor releases for backward compatible bug fix >>>>> releases only. >>>>> >>>>> Btw, it would be good (whoever has privileges) to have versions in JIRA >>>>> project sorted out: >>>>> - mark 0.10.0 as released >>>>> - remove two empty 1.0-snapshot versions >>>>> - move 1.0 to the top and clear its release date >>>>> - move 0.10.1/0.11.0 under 1.0 and after 0.10.0 >>>>> >>>>> Stevo, u should have permissions now to fix all of the above. >>>> >>>> >>>> - maybe plan and set 0.10.1/0.11.0 expected release date (Suneel was >>>>> mentioning it would be nice to integrate with Apache Flink by October >>>>> timely for http://lanyrd.com/2015/flink-forward/ ) >>>>> >>>>> This would definitely be a good story to present at >>>> http://lanyrd.com/2015/flink-forward/ >>>> >>>> The Flink team is ready to dedicate resources from their camp to work >>>> >>> with >>> >>>> us. >>>> >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Stevo Slavic. >>>>> >>>>> >
