On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Btw, I volunteer to create a 0.10.x branch and any needed changes in build > scripts to make branch releasable. In JIRA I guess these days anyone > (including me) can create 0.10.1 version and define scope for it, assign > issues. > > Yes u have admin privileges in jira now, but I would say wait until we talk tomorrow and decide on the road forward. On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm not sure but I doubt there's anything in Apache way of doing > > things, > > > > that's preventing us from having both 0.10.1 and 0.11.0 releases > > planned > > > > and worked on in parallel with dedicated branches e.g. master for > next > > > > major.minor/non-bug-fix release, and branches for bug fix supported > > > > versions like 0.10 or 0.10.x. One can create a 0.10.x branch from > > 0.10.0 > > > > release tag. Changes there have to be regularly merged to master. > > > > > > > > > > This is entirely up to the project from the Apache view point. > > > > > > (and speaking as a project member, it sounds like a good idea) > > > > > > > And projects like Flink do this today, having multiple revision branches > in > > tandem. > > >
