--- Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's so magical in ant war task?
Nothing. I would say, that I never used it before maven - jar was just fine for me. > And personally I think that as much as possible of > the code should be done > in pure java - not in jelly with help of ant. I > think that that's the > direction Maven should take. I must disagree. Maven plugins are ( partly ) pre-cooked ant intelligence, and ant does his work rightplus some internal logic to stremline ant taks setup. > This will increase quality of the code, speed and > code reuse. > So from my point of view less dependencies on ant - > better code. Not always. Or do you like to duplicate javac task? There are things which ant does really good - compilation support, file copy etc. Maven itself is a tool which offers much more than plain compilation - dependency tracking etc. Why not concwentrate on important stuff and let ant folks do their job? regards, ===== ----[ Konstantin Pribluda ( ko5tik ) ]---------------- Zu Verst�rkung meines Teams suche ich ab Sofort einen Softwareentwickler[In] f�r die Festanstellung. Arbeitsort: Mainz Skills: Programieren, Kentnisse in OpenSource-Bereich ----[ http://www.pribluda.de ]------------------------ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
