On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 18:18, Brett Porter wrote: > > This is not directed at you exclusively. It is directed at my > > first attempt, Dion's subsequent attempt and your attempt. > > The problem with the attempts is that the core is so gory > > that collaboration is difficult at best. > > I understand - I really meant to explain why it is currently stalled. > > > I approach I want to take is the one that is fastest in > > releasing 1.0 which I would say is releasing what we have and > > moving on to the new stuff. I am still going to push stuff > > from my branch into the release and I'm sure you will too but > > I don't think there is any reason in pursuing the branches > > anymore at this point. > > I think I did a reasonable job of isolating the least risky part of the job > while still removing the leak and doing it. It is -very close- to working > with everything again, so I'd prefer to stick it out. Let's say until the > end of next week. If I'm still stuck on the same problem by then, then I'll > abandon it, roll in whatever is useful back to HEAD and we'll release it as > RC2 as is, leaks and all, then start learning the new code :)
Sounds reasonable, even over the next couple weeks is fine. > - Brett -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
