Le lundi 2 février 2015 19:49:02 Andreas Gudian a écrit : > I'm pretty sure I might be bashed for writing this, but what the heck... ;-) > > I do still see some need for the maven-eclipse-plugin. > > To be perfectly clear, I agree that m2e is by far superior in many ways, > not only tech-wise, but also conceptionally. > > Still, at work we had to migrate from m2e to m-eclipse-p a couple of years > ago, which included some minor adaptations to the plugin, and it works like > a charm since then (that was back in the days when m2e was far away from > version 1.0.0). We have a workspace with about 500 projects and we commit > the eclipse metadata for each project to our source repository. Changes in > the poms don't happen that often, and if needed that one colleague runs > m-eclipse-p to update the metadata and commits everything in one go. The > other colleagues do their update, refresh in eclipse, maybe run a batch > file to download newly referenced jars to the local repo, and they're done. > Eclipse will build quite quickly. > > I just tried the latest m2e version with our projects and, although it's by > far better than it was some years ago, I had to tripple my memory settings > and wait 20 minutes for the "update project..." and the following build. > That's something I can't sell to my colleagues (many of them don't even > have enough RAM for that, sadly enough). > > So I'm herby volunteering to go ahead and pull out some of the adjustments > that I did for my customer and I'd be happy to do a release. If there's a > chance to get some PMC votes on such a thing ;-). +1 I promise I'll vote :)
> > I'd also include a disclaimer on the site that builds with m2e are in many > cases closer to the real maven build, that m2e is much more maintained, > that it is discouraged to use m-eclipse-p, and that the maven team strongly > suggests using m2e. Something like that. +1 that's a good balance IMHO > > WDYT? great plan Regards, Hervé > > Andreas > > 2015-02-02 14:00 GMT+01:00 Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>: > > Just to be perfectly clear: > > > > I am volunteering to include archetype in the herd. > > > > I have submitted INFRA-9100 to move it to git. > > I have assigned http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-471 to myself. > > > > So no need to send any email announcing its demise. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
