I think we're spending far too much energy on this discussion. Roll back to 1.6/1.6 and make the 3.4 1.7.
Kristian 2015-03-10 8:50 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>: > Java 7, ie 3.2(Java 6)/3.3(Java 7+current changes) > or > Java 6, ie 3.2(Java 6)/3.3(Java 6+current changes)/3.4(Java 7, ~1 month > later) > ? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le lundi 9 mars 2015 09:35:30 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > > Yes, I'll leave it until Wednesday to see if anyone has any issues > running > > master and then I'll stage the release. > > On Mar 8, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > > > notice that this would be a de-facto Maven versionning pattern: > > > 2.0 (Java 1.4)/2.1(Java 1.4+changes)/2.2(Java 5) > > > 3.0 (Java 5)/3.1(Java 5+changes)/3.2(Java 6) > > > > > > then 3.2(Java 6)/3.3(Java 6+changes)/3.4(Java 7), if we announce the > > > pattern and do the 3.4 release something like one month later (after > > > checking that we don't need critical fix on 3.3), could match > everybody's > > > concern > > > > > > with such a plan decision, I could go for it > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > Le dimanche 8 mars 2015 21:43:11 Robert Scholte a écrit : > > >> issues for 3.2.6 have already been pushed forward to 3.3.0 *before* > the > > >> Java7 decision. And that's fine by me. > > >> As Dennis already suggested: after 3.3.0 push JDK requirement to 1.7 > and > > >> call this Maven 3.4.0 > > >> A JDK requirement has too much impact for a 3.3.1, but IMHO it's not > > >> worth > > >> a 4.0.0 > > >> Also see previous releases when we moved forward to Java5 (M2.2) and > > >> Java6 > > >> (M3.2) > > >> > > >> Op Sun, 08 Mar 2015 21:33:38 +0100 schreef Tibor Digana > > >> > > >> <tibordig...@apache.org>: > > >>> @Robert > > >>> source=target=1.7 after M3.3.0? You mean 3.3.1? > > >>> A bit strange to make it in an incremental version since a user would > > >>> not > > >>> imaging a fix version to break the system requirements in his CI > > >>> regarding > > >>> JDK installation. > > >>> > > >>> Currently the release notes for 3.2.6 is empty. > > >>> So if there's really nothing to fix in 3.2.6, I would suggest to > jump to > > >>> 3.3.0 with JDK 7. > > >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG/fixforversion/20821 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> View this message in context: > > >>> > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/move-maven-core-to-java-7-tp5827988p582 > > >>> 85 > > >>> 22.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at > > >>> Nabble.com. > > >>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Jason van Zyl > > Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > http://twitter.com/takari_io > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he > > is responsible for the quality of the whole > > > > -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
