Sorry for the top post, phone. So are you saying that the way forward is to have junk in POM files for the way each kind of IDE does its business? Tall about mixing model and view! There is nothing wrong with eclipse:eclipse IMO but I have no spare cycles to maintain it. I'm not sure why Maven wants to go out of its way to break it though... Gary
-------- Original message -------- From: Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> Date: 10/07/2015 23:34 (GMT-08:00) To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Eclipse Plugin / Donation to Mojohaus On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does m2e still want to pollute POMs withcryptic entries? There are alternative storage possibilities, but that doesn't fix the inherited difficulties. Just mákes the SCM purists happy (and forces other users to live with the same trouble that you already fixed for yourself.) Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
