I think it doesn't work with recent log4j versions because of the missing fix in maven-embedder/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/slf4j-configuration.properties org.apache.logging.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory org.apache.maven.cli.logging.impl.Log4j2Configuration
https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/8cddea291c279130d437bcdf3337f16296558530 I just applied the fix in master ( https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/202f757af3aba6e1b96631de025e0ba692098009 ) and created a new branch with log4j 2.5 based on 3.3.9 release https://github.com/apache/maven/tree/slf4j-log4j2.5 I tested it and it is working fine You can build it with something like M2_HOME=${HOME}/Applications/apache-maven-3.3.9-log4j2 ant Regards On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Nick Stolwijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Excuses, forgot to add the link... :( > > I have it working on Maven 3.3.9. > > [1] https://garygregory.wordpress.com/2015/03/23/watch-maven-in-color/ > > With regards, > > Nick Stolwijk > > ~~~ Try to leave this world a little better than you found it and, when > your turn comes to die, you can die happy in feeling that at any rate you > have not wasted your time but have done your best ~~~ > > Lord Baden-Powell > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > What is [1] Nick ? My blog post ? It is probably outdated :( > > On which version of Maven do you try to have it working ? > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Nick Stolwijk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Arnaud, > > > > > > I have followed this blogpost[1] and to see debug information I have to > > > adjust my conf/logging/log4j2.xml instead of just add "-X" to the > command > > > line. Also, if I leave the log4j2.xml on DEBUG level, I don't have to > > > specify the "-X" parameter to see debug. In my case the "-X" doesn't do > > > anything anymore, maybe I have followed the wrong blogpost. ;) > > > > > > With regards, > > > > > > Nick Stolwijk > > > > > > ~~~ Try to leave this world a little better than you found it and, when > > > your turn comes to die, you can die happy in feeling that at any rate > you > > > have not wasted your time but have done your best ~~~ > > > > > > Lord Baden-Powell > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > What do you mean Nick ? > > > > I think it was implemented. I have the -X flag which is working with > > > DEBUG > > > > details > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Nick Stolwijk < > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> This isn't a mail to convince anyone between Log4J2 or Logback. > > > >> > > > >> I have updated my Maven installation with Log4J2, instead of the > > > default, > > > >> which worked fine. > > > >> > > > >> I missed one thing and I hope with different log implementations we > > > still > > > >> could do this "right". Maven has a nice command line parameter to > give > > > out > > > >> extra logging, the "-X" parameter. With the Log4J2 in place, this > > > logging > > > >> parameter didn't work. I have to change the logging configuration to > > > >> include DEBUG logging. Is there a way to print out the logging, > > without > > > >> regard to the logging framework, to include the debug information > when > > > >> given the "-X" parameter? > > > >> > > > >> I think it is very valuable to get extra logging without touching > any > > > >> configuration files. > > > >> > > > >> With regards, > > > >> > > > >> Nick Stolwijk > > > >> > > > >> ~~~ Try to leave this world a little better than you found it and, > > when > > > >> your turn comes to die, you can die happy in feeling that at any > rate > > > you > > > >> have not wasted your time but have done your best ~~~ > > > >> > > > >> Lord Baden-Powell > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I’ve no issue with the fix to make any implementation to work, > just > > > the > > > >> > merging of the log4j2 branch in general. > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Ralph Goers < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Jason, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I really don’t care which logging framework Maven uses. There > > isn’t > > > >> > going to be much difference between Logback and Log4j 2 in a batch > > > >> process > > > >> > like Maven, although asynchronous loggers might speed up larger > > builds > > > >> > somewhat. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > However, these comparisons are still incorrect. Log4j is using > the > > > >> ASF’s > > > >> > git repository and hasn’t really integrated pull requests from > > github > > > so > > > >> > you are comparing apples and oranges. If you look at the > changes.xml > > > >> file > > > >> > you will see 250 due-to attributions, some of which include > > committers > > > >> but > > > >> > most of which are not. Just in the latest release, 2.5, there were > > > >> > contributions from 13 individuals outside of the ASF and in the > 2.4 > > > >> release > > > >> > there were contributions from more than 20. If Logback has only > had > > > >> > contributions from 70+ non-committers since they moved to git, > then > > > >> Log4j > > > >> > is easily winning that metric. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > That said, I don’t use Maven for how cool its logging framework > > is. > > > >> > However, Gary’s original complaint about an unsupported SLF4J > > binding > > > >> seems > > > >> > like it should be addressed. Why can’t a user use their own custom > > > SLF4J > > > >> > implementation? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Ralph > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> On Jan 6, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 5:46 PM, Paul Benedict < > [email protected] > > > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Jason, I am sorry but to disagree with you. Your statistics > are > > > >> still > > > >> > not > > > >> > >>> telling a full story. I can glance at the commit graphs of > these > > > 76 > > > >> > logback > > > >> > >>> contributors rather quickly to see really how "diverse" this > > > >> community > > > >> > is. > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> * 35 (~45%) only ever made 1 contribution > > > >> > >>> * 18 (~25%) have only ever made 2 contributions > > > >> > >>> * 16 (~20%) have between 3-10 contributions. > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> This is still awesome. I would love to have 35 contributors > > making > > > >> one > > > >> > change. It all adds up. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >>> That leaves only 7 logback contributors (~10%) who actually do > > > >> > something. > > > >> > >>> And of those 7, only 4 committed something in 2015 ... and > Cecki > > > is > > > >> the > > > >> > >>> leader by far. It's clearly a very visible one man show with > > > sparse > > > >> > >>> contributions from others. > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Based on these numbers, I think Log4J2 has the better > community > > > >> > involvement. > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Everyone will interpret numbers as they wish but it’s a simple > > > thing > > > >> > even to make one change in an open source project. 99% of people > > never > > > >> do > > > >> > so to have that number of people make one or two changes is a > > > >> significant > > > >> > thing. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >>> Cheers, > > > >> > >>> Paul > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jason van Zyl < > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>>> A contributor on that page is not a comparison of committers > vs > > > >> not. > > > >> > >>>> People who have made pull requests to Maven are listed as > > > >> > contributors. > > > >> > >>>> Just as they would for Log4J2. A measure, albeit one, of the > > > >> overall > > > >> > >>>> diversity of contribution. > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Paul Benedict < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > >>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> I am writing regarding this statement: "Ceki may do more > > commits > > > >> but > > > >> > it’s > > > >> > >>>>> certainly not a one man show. 76 contributors for Logback > and > > 8 > > > >> > >>>>> contributors for Log4J2." > > > >> > >>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> The numbers in themselves do not tell a full story. It's in > > > >> > appropriate > > > >> > >>>> to > > > >> > >>>>> conclude that since 76 > 8, therefore logback is a better > > > choice. > > > >> > The 8 > > > >> > >>>>> contributors in Log4J2 have been voted in according to > Apache > > > >> bylaws. > > > >> > >>>>> Conversely, there aren't any bylaws for logback; the logback > > > >> Github > > > >> > >>>> project > > > >> > >>>>> owner can freely grant commit privileges at will ... and > > > >> evidently, > > > >> > they > > > >> > >>>>> do! So the bar for committer rights is much (much) lower > than > > at > > > >> > Apache. > > > >> > >>>> I > > > >> > >>>>> don't think the above comparison is fair toward log4j2. > > > >> > >>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> Cheers, > > > >> > >>>>> Paul > > > >> > >>>>> > > > >> > >>>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Jason van Zyl < > > [email protected]> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > >>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Arnaud Héritier < > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> great, more constructive feedback :-) > > > >> > >>>>>>> Thanks Jason > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> Both projects are well known and widely used even if log4j > > v2 > > > is > > > >> > >>>> younger > > > >> > >>>>>>> with less downloads such figures are not really > > representative > > > >> > with all > > > >> > >>>>>>> caches/repositories managers I think. > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> I don’t have a single peer that uses Log4j2 and that’s > > > important > > > >> to > > > >> > me. > > > >> > >>>> I > > > >> > >>>>>> do not believe Log4J2 is well known or widely use. I think > 3 > > > >> years > > > >> > of > > > >> > >>>>>> releases is fairly representative in that Logback is > getting > > > >> close > > > >> > to > > > >> > >>>> the > > > >> > >>>>>> Log4J incoming edge count and if you remove all the > incoming > > > >> edges > > > >> > from > > > >> > >>>>>> Apache there are not a lot of users. > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> About logback vs log4j I have really no real preference > > > >> technically > > > >> > >>>>>>> speaking (I had both branches working in the past and used > > > them > > > >> a > > > >> > lot > > > >> > >>>> in > > > >> > >>>>>> my > > > >> > >>>>>>> professional life - > > > >> > http://www.aheritier.net/united-colors-of-maven/). > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> In term of community, Log4J is in our apache community and > > we > > > >> have > > > >> > few > > > >> > >>>>>>> active committers arround. On Logback side even if I > really > > > >> > appreciate > > > >> > >>>>>> Ceki > > > >> > >>>>>>> I'm always afraid about this one-man show project. (and > Ceki > > > >> isn't > > > >> > >>>>>> perfect > > > >> > >>>>>>> too when we see the nightmare of slf4j-api 1.5+ > > > >> incompatibilities > > > >> > we > > > >> > >>>>>> always > > > >> > >>>>>>> have in 2016 !!). > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> Ceki may do more commits but it’s certainly not a one man > > show. > > > >> 76 > > > >> > >>>>>> contributors for Logback and 8 contributors for Log4J2. > It’s > > > >> stable > > > >> > and > > > >> > >>>>>> mature at this point with 54 releases versus 33 for > Log4J2. I > > > >> don’t > > > >> > >>>> think > > > >> > >>>>>> any person responsible for picking a package for logging > > would > > > >> get > > > >> > much > > > >> > >>>>>> support in their organization for Log4J2, as the data would > > > >> > suggest. I > > > >> > >>>>>> think with few contributors and usage it would likely be > > > deemed a > > > >> > less > > > >> > >>>> wise > > > >> > >>>>>> choice than Logback and possibly a risk. There are also > lots > > of > > > >> > Apache > > > >> > >>>>>> projects that use Logback. I think pragmatism is a factor > in > > > all > > > >> the > > > >> > >>>> other > > > >> > >>>>>> projects at Apache who selected Logback. Being at Apache > > > >> obviously > > > >> > >>>> wasn’t > > > >> > >>>>>> the determining criterion and it shouldn’t be. > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> I agree that we are just talking about a logging > > > implementation > > > >> > but you > > > >> > >>>>>> saw > > > >> > >>>>>>> what it gave for eclipse/aether …. > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> I’m not sure what your point is here. No one worked on any > of > > > the > > > >> > parts, > > > >> > >>>>>> ever, whether here or at Eclipse. I doubt anyone will work > on > > > it > > > >> > when it > > > >> > >>>>>> comes back. So I’m not sure what analogy you’re trying to > > make. > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> I'm clearly not enough involved enough in the project to > try > > > to > > > >> > >>>> convince > > > >> > >>>>>>> anyone about a choice to do but I can just say that not > > > having a > > > >> > >>>>>> colorized > > > >> > >>>>>>> console in 2016 is .... irritating. > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> For the problem reported by Gary I think that applying the > > fix > > > >> in > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > maven-embedder/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/slf4j-configuration.properties > > > >> > >>>>>>> ( > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/8cddea291c279130d437bcdf3337f16296558530 > > > >> > >>>>>>> ) > > > >> > >>>>>>> is safe to be back-ported in master. It is just that > > > >> > >>>>>>> org.slf4j.helpers.Log4jLoggerFactorywas for Log4J 1 AFAIU > > and > > > >> now > > > >> > that > > > >> > >>>>>>> Log4J2 is release/stabilized there is a new one : > > > >> > >>>>>>> org.apache.logging.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> If I asked Ceki for help I’d get it immediately also. Who > > isn’t > > > >> > going to > > > >> > >>>>>> help there to get their library bundled with Maven? > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> For the replacement of the implementation and activate > > colors > > > I > > > >> > prefer > > > >> > >>>> to > > > >> > >>>>>>> let active committers decide of what they are doing (I > > imagine > > > >> > that for > > > >> > >>>>>> any > > > >> > >>>>>>> choice they are doing it doesn't avoid you to use another > > one > > > in > > > >> > your > > > >> > >>>> own > > > >> > >>>>>>> distribution ? > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> I would prefer log4j2 but clearly I never merged it > because > > of > > > >> the > > > >> > >>>> slf4j > > > >> > >>>>>>> conflict that I don't understand (but I didn't spend a lot > > of > > > >> time > > > >> > on > > > >> > >>>> it) > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> To me the most important factor is usage, of course you > need > > > some > > > >> > >>>>>> threshold of developers so that people are working on it > but > > > even > > > >> > there > > > >> > >>>> I’d > > > >> > >>>>>> say it’s pretty sparse in Log4J2. But with widespread usage > > > comes > > > >> > >>>>>> examination, issue submissions, pull requests and > ultimately > > > more > > > >> > people > > > >> > >>>>>> that contribute and that’s clearly the case with Logback. I > > > don’t > > > >> > see > > > >> > >>>> how > > > >> > >>>>>> you can logically refute that and see Log4J2 a better > choice > > > >> > because of > > > >> > >>>>>> what organization it’s developed within? Logback has a > > > community > > > >> it > > > >> > just > > > >> > >>>>>> doesn’t happen to be here, and Ceki's not some random guy. > He > > > >> also > > > >> > has a > > > >> > >>>>>> long track record of open source dedication and > contribution. > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> Cheers > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Jason van Zyl < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> These are the numbers I arrived at, happy to run them > with > > > >> > different > > > >> > >>>>>>>> coordinates but thought these were representative: > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> gremlin> g.V('vc', 'log4j:log4j').inE.count() > > > >> > >>>>>>>> ==>84570 > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> gremlin> g.V('vc', > > > >> 'ch.qos.logback:logback-classic').inE.count() > > > >> > >>>>>>>> ==>62389 > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> gremlin> g.V('vc', > > > >> > 'org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core').inE.count() > > > >> > >>>>>>>> ==>3134 > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> These are incoming edges across all versions of said > > > >> coordinate. > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Jason van Zyl < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> As we said previously when the the question arose again > > > there > > > >> > would > > > >> > >>>> be > > > >> > >>>>>> a > > > >> > >>>>>>>> discussion. You may not remember, but I expect there to > be > > a > > > >> > >>>> discussion. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> I have built a graph of Maven Central to analyze the > rank > > > >> (count > > > >> > of > > > >> > >>>> all > > > >> > >>>>>>>> incoming edges) for Log4J2 and Logback and it is clear > from > > > >> those > > > >> > >>>>>> numbers > > > >> > >>>>>>>> that everyone has gone from Log4J to Logback. What has > > > >> happened, I > > > >> > >>>>>> believe > > > >> > >>>>>>>> from the numbers, is that the community followed the > > founder > > > of > > > >> > the > > > >> > >>>>>> project > > > >> > >>>>>>>> and not the owner project in pretty much the exact same > way > > > >> users > > > >> > went > > > >> > >>>>>> with > > > >> > >>>>>>>> Jenkins and not Hudson. Anyone is happy to take the graph > > and > > > >> > verify > > > >> > >>>>>> this > > > >> > >>>>>>>> themselves, or generate their own data from the machine > > that > > > is > > > >> > >>>> housing > > > >> > >>>>>> the > > > >> > >>>>>>>> copy of Maven Central at Google. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> Additionally Igor has an implementation for logging > during > > > >> > concurrent > > > >> > >>>>>>>> builds based on Logback that I would really like to use, > > and > > > >> the > > > >> > color > > > >> > >>>>>>>> logging is also easy with Logback. I do not want to use > > > >> something > > > >> > that > > > >> > >>>>>> the > > > >> > >>>>>>>> community at large has not adopted. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> Again, anyone is welcome to the code and/or the data if > > they > > > >> > want to > > > >> > >>>>>>>> verify this themselves. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> I also am not interested in a debate so if we disagree > > then > > > >> just > > > >> > >>>> leave > > > >> > >>>>>>>> the simple implementation in place. I’m not > philosophically > > > >> > motivated > > > >> > >>>>>> much > > > >> > >>>>>>>> here in these discussions but I’m vehemently opposed to > > > >> > integrating > > > >> > >>>>>> Log4J2. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:55 AM, Arnaud Héritier < > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> thanks for this valuable comment Jason :( > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Jason van Zyl < > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> -1 > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Do not merge this branch. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 4:05 AM, Tibor Digana < > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arnaud, > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you plan a Release Version to merge this branch o > > > >> master in > > > >> > >>>>>> Maven? > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Arnaud Héritier [via > > > >> Maven] < > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just because only 2.4 was available when I updated > > this > > > >> > feature > > > >> > >>>>>>>> branch > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> few > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> months ago. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mardi 5 janvier 2016, Gary Gregory <[hidden > email] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http:// > > > /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=0>> > > > >> a > > > >> > >>>> écrit : > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arnaud, > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the update. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not update the Log4j 2 dep from 2.4 to 2.5? > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gary > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Arnaud Héritier > > > <[hidden > > > >> > email] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http:// > > /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=1> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gary, > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I fixed this in the branch : > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/commits/slf4j-log4j2.4 > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fix is in > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > maven-embedder/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/slf4j-configuration.properties > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ( > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/8cddea291c279130d437bcdf3337f16296558530 > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the update I did after my old blog post : > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.aheritier.net/united-colors-of-maven/ > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Gary Gregory > > <[hidden > > > >> > email] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http:// > > /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=2> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy Holidays. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can the next version of Maven be rid of this > > warning: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARN] The SLF4J binding actually used is not > > > >> supported by > > > >> > >>>>>> Maven: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.logging.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARN] Maven supported bindings are: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARN] (from > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > jar:file:/E:/Java/apache-maven-3.3.9/bin/../lib/maven-embedder-3.3.9.jar!/META-INF/maven/slf4j-configuration.properties) > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ch.qos.logback.classic.LoggerContext > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - org.slf4j.helpers.Log4jLoggerFactory > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - org.slf4j.impl.SimpleLoggerFactory > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a step I am missing to use Log4j 2 > > cleanly? > > > My > > > >> > steps > > > >> > >>>>>> are > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> here: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > https://garygregory.wordpress.com/2015/03/23/watch-maven-in-color/ > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [hidden email] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http:// > > /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=3> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> | [hidden > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> email] <http:// > > > >> > /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=4> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition < > > > >> > >>>>>> http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/ > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action < > > > >> http://www.manning.com/templier/> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arnaud Héritier > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aheritier.net > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [hidden email] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http:// > > /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=5> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> | [hidden > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> email] <http:// > > > >> > /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=6> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition < > > > >> > >>>> http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/ > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action < > > > http://www.manning.com/templier/ > > > >> > > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Arnaud Héritier > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aheritier.net > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be > added > > > to > > > >> the > > > >> > >>>>>>>> discussion > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> below: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Log4j-Warning-tp5856237p5857870.html > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from Maven Developers, click here > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=142166&code=dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAYXBhY2hlLm9yZ3wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg== > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> . > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> NAML > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context: > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Log4j-Warning-tp5856237p5857942.html > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive > at > > > >> > Nabble.com. > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jason > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jason van Zyl > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/takari_io > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> {script:nopre:"/Users/jvanzyl/signature/signature.sh"} > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> ----- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Arnaud Héritier > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> http://aheritier.net > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> Jason > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> Jason van Zyl > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/takari_io > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> {script:nopre:"/Users/jvanzyl/signature/signature.sh"} > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> Jason > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>> Jason van Zyl > > > >> > >>>>>>>> Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > > > >> > >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > > >> > >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/takari_io > > > >> > >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> {script:nopre:"/Users/jvanzyl/signature/signature.sh"} > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>>> -- > > > >> > >>>>>>> ----- > > > >> > >>>>>>> Arnaud Héritier > > > >> > >>>>>>> http://aheritier.net > > > >> > >>>>>>> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > > >> > >>>>>>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> Thanks, > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> Jason > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>> Jason van Zyl > > > >> > >>>>>> Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > > > >> > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > > >> > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/takari_io > > > >> > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> {script:nopre:"/Users/jvanzyl/signature/signature.sh"} > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> Thanks, > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> Jason > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>> Jason van Zyl > > > >> > >>>> Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > > > >> > >>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > > >> > >>>> http://twitter.com/takari_io > > > >> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> {script:nopre:"/Users/jvanzyl/signature/signature.sh"} > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Thanks, > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Jason > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >> Jason van Zyl > > > >> > >> Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > > > >> > >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl <http://twitter.com/jvanzyl> > > > >> > >> http://twitter.com/takari_io <http://twitter.com/takari_io> > > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> {script:nopre:"/Users/jvanzyl/signature/signature.sh"} > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > <mailto: > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > <mailto: > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > >> > Jason > > > >> > > > > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > Jason van Zyl > > > >> > Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > > > >> > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > > >> > http://twitter.com/takari_io > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > > >> > {script:nopre:"/Users/jvanzyl/signature/signature.sh"} > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ----- > > > > Arnaud Héritier > > > > http://aheritier.net > > > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ----- > > Arnaud Héritier > > http://aheritier.net > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
