This looks better to me. Thanks, Robert
Verzonden vanaf Samsung Mobile. <div>-------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------</div><div>Van: Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> </div><div>Datum:21-02-2017 01:16 (GMT+01:00) </div><div>Aan: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org> </div><div>Onderwerp: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1 </div><div> </div>After some digging I think the fix for MNG-6078 is incorrect. I have taken an initial stab at what I believe to be a more correct approach: https://github.com/apache/maven/tree/mng-6078-take-2 If the integration tests pass: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/job/mng-6078-take-2/ then I believe that should solve the regressions in the surefire build between Maven 3.3.9 and Maven 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT While there are other issues with Surefire, at this point in time, from the PoV of a core release, what we need is that the build behaves the same for 3.3.9 and 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT Let's see what the build result is tomorrow! On 18 February 2017 at 17:48, Christian Schulte <c...@schulte.it> wrote: > Am 02/18/17 um 11:41 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > > We need help testing on Solaris 10/11 if anyone has access to such a > system > > On a SPARC machine, if possible, please. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
