Argh! [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.17:test (default-test) on project maven-it-plugin-class-loader: Execution default-test of goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.17:test failed: The forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called? [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C "F:\hudson\tools\java\jdk1.7.0_79-unlimited-security\jre\bin\java -jar F:\jenkins\jenkins-slave\workspace\jenkinsfile_mng-6078-take-2-WGU653E33G6IV3N2NJHKMVLGG5MR4DLVCH2IFQXOF3N3L7UEQLMA\test\core-it-support\core-it-plugins\maven-it-plugin-class-loader\maven-it-plugin-class-loader\target\surefire\surefirebooter7772622462178238603.jar F:\jenkins\jenkins-slave\workspace\jenkinsfile_mng-6078-take-2-WGU653E33G6IV3N2NJHKMVLGG5MR4DLVCH2IFQXOF3N3L7UEQLMA\test\core-it-support\core-it-plugins\maven-it-plugin-class-loader\maven-it-plugin-class-loader\target\surefire\surefire4937710436794824783tmp F:\jenkins\jenkins-slave\workspace\jenkinsfile_mng-6078-take-2-WGU653E33G6IV3N2NJHKMVLGG5MR4DLVCH2IFQXOF3N3L7UEQLMA\test\core-it-support\core-it-plugins\maven-it-plugin-class-loader\maven-it-plugin-class-loader\target\surefire\surefire_01110766369529184024tmp"
Path length longer than 256 characters blowing up windows On 21 February 2017 at 12:58, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 February 2017 at 09:35, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Stephen, so you avoided the duplicates. >> I have questions. >> >> Is it really necessary to keep duplicates of system properties in >> *List<String>** args*? >> Is it necessary to pass ordered duplicates to CLI Manager and to rely on >> CLI Manager to take care of removing duplicates? >> *CommandLine config = cliManager.parse( args.toArray( new >> String[args.size()] ) );* >> It looks like distributed functionality over two classes. >> Is it better to find the previous system property and replace it in the >> way >> as I did in Surefire? >> >> > Well it is long established behaviour in maven that the last defined > property value for a key wins. If we had the same behaviour for all the CLI > options then we would have a simpler behaviour entirely, because we could > just append the CLI args onto the end of the list. I could have > investigated making that fix, but it seemed wiser to go for the pragmatic > option of handling the merge in a package local class (and we needed a > custom class to access the protected constructor, etc) > > Changing integration tests in Surefire to make surefire build on Maven due > to changes in Maven is something that you should only do if you understand > why. Otherwise you run the risk of introducing regressions. > > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:17 AM, stephenconnolly [via Maven] < >> ml-node+s40175n5899412...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: >> >> > After some digging I think the fix for MNG-6078 is incorrect. I have >> taken >> > an initial stab at what I believe to be a more correct approach: >> > https://github.com/apache/maven/tree/mng-6078-take-2 >> > >> > If the integration tests pass: >> > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/job/mng- >> 6078-take-2/ >> > then I believe that should solve the regressions in the surefire build >> > between Maven 3.3.9 and Maven 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT >> > >> > While there are other issues with Surefire, at this point in time, from >> > the >> > PoV of a core release, what we need is that the build behaves the same >> for >> > 3.3.9 and 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT >> > >> > Let's see what the build result is tomorrow! >> > >> > On 18 February 2017 at 17:48, Christian Schulte <[hidden email] >> > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5899412&i=0>> wrote: >> > >> > > Am 02/18/17 um 11:41 schrieb Stephen Connolly: >> > > > We need help testing on Solaris 10/11 if anyone has access to such a >> > > system >> > > >> > > On a SPARC machine, if possible, please. >> > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5899412&i=1> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5899412&i=2> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------ >> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> > below: >> > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/I-think-we-are-ready-for-3- >> 5-0-alpha-1- >> > tp5897626p5899412.html >> > To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email >> > ml-node+s40175n142166...@n5.nabble.com >> > To unsubscribe from Maven Developers, click here >> > <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?m >> acro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=142166&code=dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAYX >> BhY2hlLm9yZ3wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg==> >> > . >> > NAML >> > <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?m >> acro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base >> =nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web. >> template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamesp >> ace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail. >> naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_ >> email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >> > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.c >> om/I-think-we-are-ready-for-3-5-0-alpha-1-tp5897626p5899447.html >> Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >
