On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 21:33, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> wrote:

> As discussed before: compatibility should either be 3.3.1 (since 3.3.0
> didn't make it) or 3.5.0, we should not include the (highest) bugfix
> version.
>
Great this means we can can rid of this hackhish refection stuff for
aether...

you mean we should support 3.3.1 3.3.3 and 3.3.9?
by support I mean fixing security issues.
so in this case what happen in case of a security issue for 3.3.1 do we
have a to release 3.3.1.1 3.3.3.1 3.3.9.1
Not sure I understand what we mean with support?
anyway if we say all plugins must be at least 3.3.1 it's good progress



> Robert
>
>
> On 23-5-2020 12:43:35, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:13 AM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il Sab 23 Mag 2020, 09:40 Sylwester Lachiewicz ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > sob., 23 maj 2020, 09:22 użytkownik Hervé BOUTEMY
> > >
> > > napisał:
> > >
> > > > Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > > > > > + * discussions on Maven > 3.0.x (3.1 or 3.2 or 3.3? details
> still
> > > > TDB) +
> > > > > > Java 8 prerequisites
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't be shy Hervé we can definitely says >= 3.3.9 (at least you
> will
> > > not
> > > > > hear any objections from me :) )
> > > >
> > > > looking at our history https://maven.apache.org/docs/history.html,
> > there
> > > > is 1
> > > > year between 3.1.max and 3.2.max then 1 year to 3.3.max: not so much
> > > > and AFAIK, many people went from 3.0 to 3.3+
> > > >
> > > > looks a good idea to me: +1
> > > >
> > > > any objection?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Hervé
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> -----
> Arnaud Héritier
> http://aheritier.net
> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
>


-- 
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Reply via email to