Howdy, Running or building?
As for building, I am all for it. For running (so the bytecode level of built Maven artifacts) may be "too soon" IMHO, I am unsure about this. Hence, I'd go with enforcer to require JDK17, but use compiler release=11 for now. Note: key component, like sisu inject does NOT support (yet) Java17 bytecode. T On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 6:25 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi to all, > > what do you think about using JDK17 as minimum requirement for running > the future Apache Maven 4.0.0 ? > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
