FWIW, I don't have an issue with XML in general, just the style we use.

An as aside, I find it amusing to watch the JSON folks reinvent each and
every wheel that XML has been using for decades.

Gary

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, 10:34 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> @Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> thing is that we regularly hear
> that but nobody (as in "not significantly enough") embraced polyglot so
> means the verbosity is something you note but don't really care after all
> probably (not 100% sure it would help to solve that since attributes have
> kind of the same cons, ie make the parsing harder for generic consumers -
> and yes, in 202x xml is still not a first citizen in all languages ;)).
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le mar. 22 août 2023 à 15:55, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> One of Maven's pain points (a criticism hear at least) it's verbosity due
>> to the XML style where almost everything is an element. If I can more
>> succinctly list my dependencies, I would consider that a first win in this
>> new Era that will be highly visible to even the most casual user :-)
>> Hopefully this feature will be documented.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, 9:35 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > @Gary it is the stage "you can do whatever you like on your side", even
>> a
>> > pom.properties flavor would work. I assume one of the most requested
>> > feature will be to flatten attributes more than inlining them
>> > ("org.apache.foo:bar:1.2.3") but on the core side the challenge can be
>> to
>> > not break too fast all the "quick parsers" out there so likely staged
>> for
>> > v5 more than v4?
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > <
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > Le mar. 22 août 2023 à 14:58, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> a
>> écrit
>> > :
>> >
>> > > Not directly, but a simple extension could allow that...
>> > >
>> > > Le mar. 22 août 2023 à 12:33, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a
>> > > écrit :
>> > >
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > Would any of these changes allow me to write my POM's XML
>> dependencies
>> > > in a
>> > > > single element where the GID, AID, and version are attributes (and
>> not
>> > > > child elements)?
>> > > >
>> > > > <dependency groupId="org.apache..." artifactId="commons-io"
>> > > > version="2.13.0" ... />
>> > > >
>> > > > In general, I want the XML to more OO, where XML elements are
>> objects
>> > and
>> > > > attributes are, well, attributes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Gary
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, 3:36 AM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi everyone,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I hope you guys have been able to rest a bit during the summer
>> (for
>> > > those
>> > > > > that are back to work already)...
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I've pushed a few important PRs in the past months and I'd really
>> > like
>> > > to
>> > > > > get the discussion going around those.  Those are major changes
>> that
>> > I
>> > > > > think we should introduce in Maven 4 asap:
>> > > > >   * Better support for alternative POM syntaxes
>> > > > >   * Needed infrastructure to evolve the model
>> > > > >   * POM mixins
>> > > > >   * Support for XML entities / XInclude
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The first 3 changes are stacked onto each other. The first one is
>> the
>> > > > > support for alternative POM syntaxes [2].  Note that no syntax is
>> > > > provided
>> > > > > by the PR, but an example extension is provided in the IT PR [3],
>> the
>> > > > > reader being generated using the maven model and the IT's project
>> is
>> > > > using
>> > > > > it [4].  The main idea is to provide an enhanced XML syntax if we
>> > want,
>> > > > as
>> > > > > it was discussed for the POM 5.0 [5].
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The second one provides the ability to make evolution to the model
>> > > > without
>> > > > > breaking the maven ecosystem.  The model has been stuck in 4.0.0
>> > > version
>> > > > > for 15 years or so, most of the things that would have required a
>> > > change
>> > > > > have been delayed or worked around.  The consumer POM that has
>> been
>> > > > > introduced in Maven 4 is a first step, but I think we should go
>> > > further.
>> > > > > Please read the details in the PR [6].
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The third one is the support for POM mixins [7].  That one is
>> still a
>> > > > > draft.  Two ITs have been written to leverage mixins using GAV or
>> as
>> > > > > relative paths [8].  This definitely needs some work, but the
>> current
>> > > > state
>> > > > > definitely shows that it can be implemented and introduced in the
>> > next
>> > > > > alphas.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The last one is a relatively small PR [9] which brings support for
>> > XML
>> > > > > entities and XInclude loaded from external files.  All loaded
>> files
>> > are
>> > > > > loaded using relative URLs (absolute URLs are rejected for
>> security
>> > > > > reasons). The entities and xinclude bits are all inlined during
>> the
>> > raw
>> > > > ->
>> > > > > consumer POM transformation so that they don't appear in
>> > > repositories.  I
>> > > > > wrote this PR as a possible alternative for mixins, that's the
>> main
>> > > > reason
>> > > > > why I include it in this discussion.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm not necessarily looking for in-depth reviews of the PRs, but
>> at
>> > > least
>> > > > > to find a consensus and general agreement on the way forward.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > Guillaume
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1197
>> > > > > [3]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/276/files#diff-ffb3dec529cab94ebf3c5830444275ad2b2e4826fe1df843454882efadd2446c
>> > > > > [4]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/276/files#diff-8d7362e60d231ad8c5d4b7746873da2855d9cf1fd5aeeca9c143ed942bd94b38
>> > > > > [5]
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/POM+Model+Version+5.0.0
>> > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1160
>> > > > > [7]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1209/commits/211e27acd21a6cb8cee30ccd066499fc613a5c82
>> > > > > [8]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/tree/b2642d74caae854051dc77acd19b972dfe66b1cd/core-it-suite/src/test/resources/mng-5102-mixins
>> > > > > [9] https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1205
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > ------------------------
>> > > > > Guillaume Nodet
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > ------------------------
>> > > Guillaume Nodet
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to