Make love not var!

T

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:09 PM Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I hate var.
> ________________________________
> From: Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 9:52:08 PM
> To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven
>
> Howdy,
>
> Some more stats based on 2nd package from Brian
>
> https://gist.github.com/cstamas/8207f8d70882090a1c63cdedc256ec56
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:08 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold <elh...@ibiblio.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, with var you still get type checks, unlike in Python. But I have
> > wasted so much time debugging Python code simply because the type of a
> > local variable wasn't right there in the declaration that I remain
> > unconvinced var was ever a good idea. I have been convinced by
> > experience that implicitly typed local variables dramatically reduce
> > debugging speed. This isn't something I believed two years ago. Back
> > then I mostly didn't think about it. But since then I have worked a
> > lot with implicit typing, and it is painful.
> >
> > IDEs are not a full solution. They're better in Java than Python, I
> > admit, but I spend more time reading code in tools like Github and
> > Critique than in IDEs.
> >
> > I don't think banning var goes against the community in any way. It's
> > simply another style choice for improved readability and
> > maintainability, like everything spotless and checkstyle currently do.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Le ven. 23 févr. 2024 à 13:44, Elliotte Rusty Harold <
> elh...@ibiblio.org>
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:23 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > @Elliotte while you are pretty right in terms of *compile* features
> > but
> > > > it
> > > > > ignores the biggest criteria for any ASF project : the community.
> > Even if
> > > > > silly, attracting people with Java 8 is born dead today (to
> > illustrate it
> > > > > just ask somebody to no more use "var" to do a PR for ex, he will
> > start
> > > > to
> > > > > "pfffff" ;)).
> > > >
> > > > Going off on a tangent but I would reject any PR that showed up in my
> > > > code review queue that used "var", regardless of JDK version. It's an
> > > > abomination that should never have been added to Java. It prioritizes
> > > > a trivial speed up in writing code at the cost of a significant slow
> > > > down in reading and debugging code. Working in Python for the last
> > > > couple of years has thoroughly convinced me that strong, explicit
> > > > compile time types are the right way to go. I've seen what happens
> > > > when you don't have them, and it's not fun.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I assume you never used it to write that cause you don't loose compile
> > > checks, you are not slower to read nor debug but generally faster cause
> > > readability is increased and if you miss the 35 char long type your
> > > preferred IDE will compensate that easily.
> > > It is literally similar to streams or even plain old java, it depends
> the
> > > habit of the coder but if we consider that we would also prevent
> foreach
> > > usage.
> > > You can also reverse it and write the exact same sentence on "not using
> > > var", how slow it is to read such a code where half of the chars don't
> > > bring any useful data or encourage palantir formatting to break on
> > multiple
> > > lines a single statement.
> > > So IMHO this is not something right to think nor even consider.
> > >
> > > Ultimately the point is not "do we think it is good or not", it is
> > > literally that if we go against the move then we go against the
> > community -
> > > keep in mind we should probably not be the primary citizens there - and
> > > therefore I'm not sure the point to be at Apache if we don't care about
> > our
> > > community.
> > > I'm clearly to stay there and enable people to join rather than staying
> > > alone 10 years ago (happy anniversary java 8 ;)).
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Elliotte Rusty Harold
> > > > elh...@ibiblio.org
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Elliotte Rusty Harold
> > elh...@ibiblio.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to