On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 22:25 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > Mark, > > I like it! I'd been thinking about this and resolved not to change it, > but we could certainly have both. > > What do others think?
Makes sense, but change it before the final release and just go with the one. > - Brett > > Mark Hobson wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >Now I'm sure this is a programming faux pas (and also badly timed > >being so near to 2.0 final) but I've been pondering this since the > >alpha1 days - what do people think of renaming the m2 executable to > >mvn? The reasoning being: > > > >* m2 does differentiate from the m1 maven executable, but what happens > >when m2.1 and m3 come out - do we keep changing the cmdline? > > > >* mvn still allows maven1 and maven2 to co-exist side-by-side, but is > >also future-proof > > > >* mvn is a handy TLA like svn, cvs or ant and other tools people type > >many times a day > > > >* the keys 'm', 'v' and 'n' are conveniently located almost > >side-by-side on the same row > > > >* mvn is simply maven with the vowels dropped > > > >What do people think? I realise this is hardly a blocker but it's > >good to get off my chest! > > > >Cheers, > > > >Mark > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth. -- Unknown --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
