Jason van Zyl wrote: >On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 22:25 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > > >>Mark, >> >>I like it! I'd been thinking about this and resolved not to change it, >>but we could certainly have both. >> >>What do others think? >> >> > >Makes sense, but change it before the final release and just go with the >one. > >
But then we'd need to remember it! I was thinking renaming them to mvn, and having an m2 script that just called mvn, possibly with a deprecation warning? - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
