Jason van Zyl wrote:
> It's not supplanting the mailing list, it's providing a clear location
> for the actions taken by the project. 

I totally agree with the need to track stuff properly as I am generally
the one chasing things up, my point was just ot give John a chance to
finish what he's started.

How do you see this working - create an issue before sending any ideas
to the list?

Seems like unnecessary overhead to me, but given we generally agree it
probably isn't much different. I just think things take shape on the
list first, then you file an issue when you've decided what you want to
do. The person starting the thread follows it up. If nobody cares enough
to do that, let it die.

I have a system for dealing with mail, and I like using the mailing
list. I'm sure I'm not alone. I skip over JIRA stuff much more quickly
and its a whole lot slower to operate with while in the discussion
phase. I do not want to use JIRA for discussion. As long as we're just
tracking and its easy, I'm all for it.

For the purposes you are talking about, like a/c creation, it sounds
great. You might also look into the (STATUS) mails that other projects
get from a certain file - maybe we can easily maintain a little list in
SVN that can be used for these issues if it is more convenient. Just
tossing out ideas

- Brett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to