That's the real one : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1908
On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops wrong one, forget the last email. On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the issue I am speaking about : > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289 > > On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I > > can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename > > or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of months ago > > saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find the JIRA > > issue. > > > > This is definitely a showstopper when you don't know about it. > > > > On 9/17/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/17/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot apache > > > > repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a unique version > > > > identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a lot of people > > > > have trouble when it's come to snapshot dependencies. > > > > > > Do you mean *without* a unique version identifier here? > > > > > > This is the 'Maven 2.0.4 will not download a x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar if one > > > is already present in the local repository' problem, correct? > > > > > > It would be nice if it would deploy both a uniquely named version > > > _and_ the x.x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar. The projects I'm involved with have > > > uniqueVersion set to false for that reason. > > > > > > -- > > > Wendy > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
