Hi Jesse,
Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data
model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the
domain entities directly in the view?
I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only
exposes that required stuff for view preparation.
Rahul
Jesse McConnell wrote:
yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and
project group and projects bits like name, group, etc..
so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume
jesse
On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for
preparing views for the webapp?
Cheers,
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
> anyone?
>
> On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be
>> partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more?
>> What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid?
>>
>> - Brett
>
