no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff thats all
On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jesse, Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the domain entities directly in the view? I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only exposes that required stuff for view preparation. Rahul Jesse McConnell wrote: > yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and > project group and projects bits like name, group, etc.. > > so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume > > jesse > > On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for >> preparing views for the webapp? >> >> Cheers, >> Rahul >> >> >> Brett Porter wrote: >> > anyone? >> > >> > On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: >> > >> >> I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be >> >> partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? >> >> What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? >> >> >> >> - Brett >> > >> > >
-- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
