On 6/17/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18/06/2007, at 11:46 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Technically, if you follow all the latest legal discussions and stuff,
> the name of the tgz/zip should be "apache-maven-2.0.7" which would
> allow
> to use an artifactId of apache-maven. We just changed over to that
> format for CXF. That way the signatures are all OK as is. (The
> directory it extracts to should also be apache-maven)
Do you have a pointer to the specific message-id or policy document
for this? I thought I followed that discussion and it was not seen as
a requirement.
I can't see why it would be legally required.
I remember that discussion but not if there was a decision. However i
remember that using groupId+artifactId would be ok for legal so the
word apache is in the assembly
>
> That's a new one. A bunch of use have been using the RR plugin
> without
> that error. That said, I think the maven parent is still locking
> down
> to a relatively old version which had a bunch of other issues with
> NPE's
> and such when there are SNAPSHOTS. Have you tried with one of the
> newer versions of RR?
You're right, it's pinned to alpha-2 but 5 is out.
Jason - how do I reproduce the error if I want to check it?
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
