Would a concept of profile groups help to determine which profiles are
meant to be mutually exclusive?

I use mutually exclusive profiles for different deployment
configurations, for example development and production.  By default,
the development profile is actived by default, so currently
-Pproduction would disable the development profile and enable the
production profile.  The proposed changes would require
-P!development,production, which is a little cumbersome and prone to
error.

+1 for using the !-notation for disabling profiles.

Mark

2008/5/14 Paul Gier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I would like to bring up a couple of issues related to profile activation
> and deactivation.  While working on MNG-3545 I noticed some cases where the
> current behaviour might be improved.
>
>
> 1. What is the correct behaviour when there is more than one activeByDefault
> profile and I manually activate one of them?  Currently, if I have two
> activeByDefault profiles, profile1 and profile2, and I run "mvn -P+profile1"
> then profile1 stays active and profile2 is deactivated.  This also bring up
> the following more general question.
>
>
> 2. Should default profiles be automatically deactivated if another profile
> is activated?  I don't think the current behaviour should be changed in
> 2.0.x, but for 2.1 I think it's worth considering leaving default profiles
> active unless explicitly disabled.
>
> If you think of profiles as being mutually exclusive, then it makes sense to
> activate one and have the default profile be deactivated.  But IMO that
> seems to be a less common use case vs. using profiles to activate particular
> parts of a build and not normally interfering with each other.  In this case
> it seems more intuitive that an activeByDefault profile is always active
> unless deactivated. In addition, now that profiles can be deactivated as
> needed from the command line, there doesn't seem to be as much of a need to
> have activeByDefault profiles automatically turn off.
>
>
> 3. There was a suggestion to allow the use of "!" to disable a profile.  So
> the command line would look like: mvn -P!myProfile
>
> This seems more intuitive than the current syntax using a dash, and I
> created MNG-3571 for it.  But I'm hesitant to add it since we can already
> use "-" for this, and it looks like "mvn -P D:myProfile" was added as
> another option for disabling a profile in 2.1.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to