Hi, AFAIK, 2.0.10-RC maven branch use 1.0-beta-4. I'm not usually working on this part of our projects but I can't see a big difference between 1.0-beta-3 and 1.0-beta-4.
So why not taking 1.0-beta-4 tag and branch it for Wagon 1.0.x ? -- Olivier 2008/8/24 Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Wagon changed to much after the beta-3 for my taste and we're pretty much in > the same boat as we are with Maven 2.0.x versus 2.1.x. > > I would like to take the 1.0-beta-3 tag and branch it for Wagon 1.0.x, and > then make trunk Wagon 1.1.x. > > I personally want to stabilize trunk for a release and I want to use Wagon > beta-3 with some fixes. > > I think that 2.0.x should use this Wagon 1.0.x that I would like to make > from the current beta-3 tag, and 2.1.x can start using some of the new Wagon > changes. But too much was changed in a beta in Wagon. > > Any objections? > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > jason at sonatype dot com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > believe nothing, no matter where you read it, > or who has said it, > not even if i have said it, > unless it agrees with your own reason > and your own common sense. > > -- Buddha > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
