Do you have an actual problem you are trying to fix? If you don't want
to go hunting and need help, just ask. There's no point fiddling
versions and creating more confusion for no reason.
Seriously, Wagon should be the least of your concerns in trying to
stabilise things there. How about telling us what you are trying to
achieve or the problems you're having instead? A month ago you were
stabilising, a couple of weeks ago you were intent on rewriting
significant parts, now you're stabilising for release again. Instead
of being able to dig in and help out, we're wasting time trying to
figure out what to call things.
Cheers,
Brett
On 25/08/2008, at 11:12 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
In short I don't want to go hunting, and akin to what we're going
with 2.0.x and 2.1.x. The changes were too great for a beta and I
don't really want to put them into the 3.0-alpha-1 release.
That is significant:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10335&fixfor=12544
If the bug fixes could be separated from large refactoring I could
live with it. Nothing immensely terrible seems to be happening to
the 2.0.9 folks using beta-2.
I meant rollback to beta-2 for a 1.0.x and then take the 1.0-beta-3
for Wagon 1.1.x.
I think 2.0.x should stay with what I suggest as Wagon 1.0.x and let
2.1.x use Wagon 1.1.x.
On 24-Aug-08, at 5:56 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 25/08/2008, at 7:50 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
proxies don't work properly in beta-4.
Are you recalling this from memory or have a particular bug?
Proxies weren't working in beta-3 because I made a stupid typo and
there wasn't a test case, not because of the significance of
changes. That got fixed in beta-4.
John reported a potential backwards compatibility issue (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-234
), but it hasn't been confirmed yet. Is this what you are seeing?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
be omnipotent for a while.
-- Jakob Burckhardt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
