That's a maven-artifact problem:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-224
On 24-Aug-08, at 9:58 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=143319
can be consider serious issue found in wagon beta-3
Milos
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I don't have a specific problem other then the few things that have
cropped
up, but the vast majority of people have not tried the new wagon
and you
honestly have no idea what's going to happen. I would just rather
be safe
then repentant.
I not to worried about fiddling versions, I just want to patch fix
what was
used for the last release myself. It's generally the case that we
have
problems when we do this.
I personally don't think it's for "no good reason": I want to do
what we
just decided to do with Maven itself. With Wagon we should have
just cut the
release and moved on.
On 24-Aug-08, at 7:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Do you have an actual problem you are trying to fix? If you don't
want to
go hunting and need help, just ask. There's no point fiddling
versions and
creating more confusion for no reason.
Seriously, Wagon should be the least of your concerns in trying to
stabilise things there. How about telling us what you are trying
to achieve
or the problems you're having instead? A month ago you were
stabilising, a
couple of weeks ago you were intent on rewriting significant
parts, now
you're stabilising for release again. Instead of being able to dig
in and
help out, we're wasting time trying to figure out what to call
things.
Cheers,
Brett
On 25/08/2008, at 11:12 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
In short I don't want to go hunting, and akin to what we're going
with
2.0.x and 2.1.x. The changes were too great for a beta and I
don't really
want to put them into the 3.0-alpha-1 release.
That is significant:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10335&fixfor=12544
If the bug fixes could be separated from large refactoring I
could live
with it. Nothing immensely terrible seems to be happening to the
2.0.9 folks
using beta-2.
I meant rollback to beta-2 for a 1.0.x and then take the 1.0-
beta-3 for
Wagon 1.1.x.
I think 2.0.x should stay with what I suggest as Wagon 1.0.x and
let
2.1.x use Wagon 1.1.x.
On 24-Aug-08, at 5:56 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 25/08/2008, at 7:50 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
proxies don't work properly in beta-4.
Are you recalling this from memory or have a particular bug?
Proxies
weren't working in beta-3 because I made a stupid typo and there
wasn't a
test case, not because of the significance of changes. That got
fixed in
beta-4.
John reported a potential backwards compatibility issue
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-234), but it hasn't been
confirmed
yet. Is this what you are seeing?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
be omnipotent for a while.
-- Jakob Burckhardt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
What matters is not ideas, but the people who have them. Good
people can fix
bad ideas, but good ideas can't save bad people.
-- Paul Graham
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead.
-- Unknown
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
