Jason van Zyl wrote:

Benjamin, you've basically done all the work for the ITs so far. You think you might sketch out in the wiki what you think would be ideal? At this point I think we defer to you as you've been working on them so long.

There isn't really much to say. The ITs just work as before my changes, merely a little more stable and faster (hopefully), which doesn't mean there isn't more to improve.

Still on my TODO list is a patch for VELO's nice emma4it-maven-plugin to spit the XML/text reports for the coverage out during a normal build such that we don't need to generate a site but can simply activate a profile that adds the Emma invocations around the normal test execution.

The next step would be to combine the test coverage from the core ITs with the coverage from the ordinary unit tests to get the complete picture. So far I have no clear idea how we arrange that workflow given that the ITs and the UTs reside in independent builds/directories. One option might be to collect the coverage data in a known location like java.io.tmpdir between the two builds but that's just a spontenous thought.

If anybody feels there should be more to say, please ask ;-)


Benjamin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to