If in the new pom with another groupId we add the relocation info with old
group, doesn't it solve the problem ? I didn't test.

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Stan Devitt <[email protected]> wrote:

> The only thing preventing changing the groupId/ArtifactId is that if you
> do, it breaks dependency resolution and hence the maven model.  That is
> pretty serious.
>
> Now, ... perhaps if there were some sort of alias facility so that
> dependency resolution could be told that two different
> Artifact coordinate sets were really the same up to version number ?
>
> Until then - all you have is version number to play with.
>
> Stan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Gier [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:54 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Depending on Artifacts not in central
>
>
> [stuff deleted ... ]
>
> So I don't really know if/how this can work with also making it easy for
> users
> of our projects to depend on our artifacts without using our repository.
> I
> would be fine with changing the groupId (maybe prefixing org.jboss) for
> rebuilt
> jars if there was an easier way to sync with the original groupId in the
>
> dependency tree.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to