Hi, Thank you for the comments.
First of all, these changes DO NOT affect the existing integration test suite. I verified this by running the ENTIRE suite with & without my patches. The *results are the same*. Secondly, I am in no urgent need to get these changes to Maven 3.0.x. Do it as you see fit. My request for applying the patches was only from a pure code review perspective. Lastly, I shall update the JIRA ticket with the specific use cases where this feature helps. If my time permits, I'll update the usage & documentation. Sincere Regards, Kalyan C. Akella On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Jason van Zyl <ja...@sonatype.com> wrote: > > On Feb 5, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Kalyan Akella wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I attached the revised patches to the issues that implement the > following: > > > > 1. ability to skip multiple plugins & their executions at CLI, > > 2. ability to skip plugins & their executions in POM using the <skip> > > element > > > > I'm still working on the documentation. Please apply the patches and let > me > > know your comments. > > > > These patches are not going to be applied to trunk right away. > > I would suggest using the Github Maven tree, make a branch and apply your > changes there if you would like people to try them. This is something that > would greatly change the behavior of Maven so it's not going into 3.0.x. It > may go into Maven 3.1 but that's a discussion. Changes like this aren't > going in without a discussion. I also asked that explanations be provided > about why this patch is useful and the use cases surrounding its > functionality. > > If you haven't already, we can show you how the integration test suite > works, as any changes you make must not affect the operation of the existing > integration tests. > > > Sincere Regards, > > Kalyan C. Akella > > > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Kalyan Akella <kalyan.ake...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Thank you for the patch review comments. I hope it is integrated to the > >> trunk. > >> > >> My next steps: > >> > >> 1. Implement support for skipping multiple plugins/executions at the > CLI. > >> 2. Implement ability to skip plugin execution through the POM as > required > >> by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3102 > >> 3. Add documentation (with the proper reasoning) for both these > approaches. > >> > >> > >> Sincere Regards, > >> Kalyan C. Akella > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Kristian Rosenvold < > >> kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Our main topic of discussion on irc was initially if this *should* be a > >>> 3.0.X or 3.1 issue due to being somewhat of a borderline between > >>> improvement/new feature. It seems to me like the way this discussion is > >>> heading, it should probably be tagged 3.1. > >>> > >>> I agree very much about getting some well defined use cases and > >>> John's comments on the issue are also very good. > >>> > >>> I will leave the issue at "3.1" for now, and request well defined > >>> use-cases on the issue. > >>> > >>> Kristian (I have all the skip options I need already) > >>> > >>> > >>> ti., 01.02.2011 kl. 15.44 -0500, skrev Jason van Zyl: > >>>> So the technical work was done implementing this but no where in the > >>> issue does it describe why this feature is useful. > >>>> > >>>> This fundamentally changes the behaviour of the lifecycle and the > >>> example listed in the issue is skipping tests. Some explanation of why > this > >>> is good would be nice, there's nothing about the reasoning of the > feature in > >>> the issue. Possibly something like: > >>>> > >>>> - As a user I would like to skip the test phase locally, and only from > >>> the command line so it's easier while I experiment putting new test > features > >>> in place. But I would like to guarantee that these can only be done > from the > >>> command line and never in the presence of the release plugin so that > >>> skipping phases is not done inadvertently during a release. > >>>> > >>>> The second case in a issue doesn't strike me as useful without an > >>> explanation, to run to the install phase but not package the JAR? > >>>> > >>>> I think a fundamental alteration of behaviour requires an explanation > of > >>> reasoning. I believe that is reasonable. It initially strikes me as a > >>> potentially bad idea. Maybe you talked about the reasoning in IRC, > which I > >>> think is perfectly fine, just toss the discussion or salient points of > the > >>> reasoning into the issue. > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I have looked at the patch diffs and it looks really great, one of > the > >>>>> better patches I've seen in the issue trackers ! > >>>>> > >>>>> We had a quick chat about this patch on irc and we figured we could > >>> take > >>>>> this patch for 3.0.x. > >>>>> > >>>>> One thing we would like though, is to be able to specify multiple > >>>>> exclusions, not just one plugin/execution. Any chance you could fix > >>>>> that ? > >>>>> > >>>>> As for the documentation, that would be something > >>>>> like https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk > >>>>> > >>>>> and the document > >>>>> > >>>>> src/site/apt/guides/mini/guide-configuring-maven.apt > >>>>> > >>>>> Sorry for not replying immediately; been busy preparing > >>>>> my trip to the alps tomorrow ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> Kristian > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ti., 01.02.2011 kl. 09.16 +0530, skrev Kalyan Akella: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any updates on the patch. Did it apply cleanly ? Any comments, > >>> changes ?? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sincere Regards, > >>>>>> Kalyan C. Akella > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Kalyan Akella < > >>> kalyan.ake...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thank you for the comments. I updated the issue, > >>>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3321 with the modified > patches. > >>>>>>> Regarding your point about documentation, will you please point me > >>> to the > >>>>>>> exact location where I should include the usage instructions for > >>> this > >>>>>>> feature and other info (perhaps a wiki ?). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sincere Regards, > >>>>>>> Kalyan C. Akella > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Kristian Rosenvold < > >>>>>>> kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the patch, which looks good. I added some comments to > >>> the > >>>>>>>> issue, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3321 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Kristian > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Jason > >>>> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> Jason van Zyl > >>>> Founder, Apache Maven > >>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>> First, the taking in of scattered particulars under one Idea, > >>>> so that everyone understands what is being talked about ... Second, > >>>> the separation of the Idea into parts, by dividing it at the joints, > >>>> as nature directs, not breaking any limb in half as a bad carver > might. > >>>> > >>>> -- Plato, Phaedrus (Notes on the Synthesis of Form by C. Alexander) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth. > > -- Unknown > > > >