On 24 May 2011 16:05, Kristian Rosenvold <[email protected]> wrote: > ti., 24.05.2011 kl. 12.23 +0100, skrev Stephen Connolly: >> The general consensus is that Martin is a bot. >> >> The idea is that we write tests that cover all the functionality of >> plexus-utils (preference is to write tests without looking at the >> plexus-utils code so that the tests are somewhat clean-room, but there >> is no hard requirement in this case... the desire is more to ensure >> that they are good tests) >> >> That will give us a good test coverage of plexus-utils... >> > > Quite a lot of plexus-utils code has decent test coverage, so you may > consider using that as a starting point - all depending on how much > wheel you prefer reinventing ;) >
Hey if we could just copy the plexus source code in tree we wouldn't be doing this would we? If you have the provenance of the code and it is ASL license friendly, then fine copy & paste. > Kristian > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
