My guess is a reference to Forrest Gump - you never know what you are going to get.
Ralph On Jun 18, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > agreed > although scanning the Surefire JIRA i did notice some of jasons original > jiras were'nt addressed for upwards of 3-4 years (by Brett Porter) > > I havent heard of JIRA chocolate box..maybe an implementation of a Finite > State Machine or perhaps this is a non sequitir? > Bedankt, > Martin > ______________________________________________ > >> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:30:04 -0400 >> Subject: The JIRA chocolate box >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> I just looked at the 'blocker' issues. We have a variety of very old >> JIRAs here. None of the ones I looked at have a self-contained test >> case that would can be downloaded, run, and converted to an >> integration test, etc. >> >> What's the policy? My temptation would be to comment on them asking if >> the OP is still interested (in some cases, 5 years later), and, if so, >> can they come up with a repeatable test case, and if not close as not >> a real bug. >> >> I don't mind in some cases doing work to build a test case, but to go >> to all this trouble for a bug that was opened about maven 2.0.x, where >> it may not be that easy to reconstruct the critical components of the >> problem, seems a dubious use of time. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
