I am only proposing this for MNG at this point. On Jun 18, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> My guess is a reference to Forrest Gump - you never know what you are going > to get. > > Ralph > > On Jun 18, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > >> >> agreed >> although scanning the Surefire JIRA i did notice some of jasons original >> jiras were'nt addressed for upwards of 3-4 years (by Brett Porter) >> >> I havent heard of JIRA chocolate box..maybe an implementation of a Finite >> State Machine or perhaps this is a non sequitir? >> Bedankt, >> Martin >> ______________________________________________ >> >>> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:30:04 -0400 >>> Subject: The JIRA chocolate box >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> I just looked at the 'blocker' issues. We have a variety of very old >>> JIRAs here. None of the ones I looked at have a self-contained test >>> case that would can be downloaded, run, and converted to an >>> integration test, etc. >>> >>> What's the policy? My temptation would be to comment on them asking if >>> the OP is still interested (in some cases, 5 years later), and, if so, >>> can they come up with a repeatable test case, and if not close as not >>> a real bug. >>> >>> I don't mind in some cases doing work to build a test case, but to go >>> to all this trouble for a bug that was opened about maven 2.0.x, where >>> it may not be that easy to reconstruct the critical components of the >>> problem, seems a dubious use of time. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
