Olivier increased it to 30 min
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-365
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1213414

Thus I suppose we have to prepare another RC ?
Is there others feedback to listen before launching another RC ?
Others problems with the RC3 ?




On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote:

> I also think that 60s timeout is way too short for corporate users. I
> suggest something like at least 180s (500s would be even better). If
> we go with 60s, I know for sure that it will fail for most of my
> corporate customers and Maven will be the focus of some more bad
> talks. Please don't do this - it will be bad for Maven!
> Those that want to lower timeout could configure that. A third digit
> release should not have a big impact on your environment.
>
> As someone pointed out, in most corporate environments downloads are
> scanned by AV engines. And that means that the entire file needs to be
> downloaded by that engine and then scanned, before made available to
> the repo manager. So this isn't something that the repo manager could
> fix.
>
> /Anders
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 16:21, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1 to have it set to 5 or 10 minutes by default and with a big warning
> and
> > associated doc in the release note
> > Even if I understand Brian about the "why do we fix something not
> reported
> > as broken", I would better consider it as an improvement and not a fix.
> > Do we have to release a 3.1 just for this improvement .... I'm not
> sure...
> > Do we want to wait for a 3.1 to include it ... I'm less sure ...
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Igor Fedorenko <i...@ifedorenko.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> m2e has read timeout of 60s by default (IDE is different environment,
> >> we can't afford blocking build thread forever). There were
> >> bugreports about this. Some corporate users reported wait times in tens
> >> of minutes due to conservative firewall setup that fully downloads
> >> artifacts and does antivirus scan before serving the artifact to the
> >> client.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Igor
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11-12-12 9:45 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >>
> >>> 2011/12/12 Brian Fox<bri...@infinity.nu>:
> >>>
> >>>> Agree.
> >>>>> I will add it in release and complete documentation here:
> >>>>> http://maven.apache.org/**guides/mini/guide-http-**settings.html<
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-http-settings.html>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> This seems like a pretty big change and not enough people will read
> >>>> that and start to freak out. If maven worked all this time with no
> >>>> read timeout, why change it now? I've never been aware of it causing a
> >>>> problem and this is just begging for all kinds of bug reports and
> >>>> flaming blogs.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> If any remote repository/server hang, I'm still thinking not wait
> >>> infinitely a response from a server is a good idea and will provide a
> >>> better user experience. (sure IMHO)
> >>>
> >>> BTW 60s value is maybe to small.
> >>> What would you prefer as value ? 300s ?
> >>>
> >>> Note this value is the SO_TIMEOUT which is the value before receiving
> >>> the first packet or the maximum of inactivity time between 2 packets.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> - Brett
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Brett Porter
> >>>>>> br...@apache.org
> >>>>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.**com/<
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>> http://au.linkedin.com/in/**brettporter<
> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> >>>>>> ---------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<
> dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Olivier Lamy
> >>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> >>>>> ---------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<
> dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> >>>> ---------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<
> dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<
> dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to