Le 13 décembre 2011 09:35, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Olivier increased it to 30 min
> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-365
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1213414
>
> Thus I suppose we have to prepare another RC ?
> Is there others feedback to listen before launching another RC ?
> Others problems with the RC3 ?

need a wagon release first.

>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote:
>
>> I also think that 60s timeout is way too short for corporate users. I
>> suggest something like at least 180s (500s would be even better). If
>> we go with 60s, I know for sure that it will fail for most of my
>> corporate customers and Maven will be the focus of some more bad
>> talks. Please don't do this - it will be bad for Maven!
>> Those that want to lower timeout could configure that. A third digit
>> release should not have a big impact on your environment.
>>
>> As someone pointed out, in most corporate environments downloads are
>> scanned by AV engines. And that means that the entire file needs to be
>> downloaded by that engine and then scanned, before made available to
>> the repo manager. So this isn't something that the repo manager could
>> fix.
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 16:21, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > +1 to have it set to 5 or 10 minutes by default and with a big warning
>> and
>> > associated doc in the release note
>> > Even if I understand Brian about the "why do we fix something not
>> reported
>> > as broken", I would better consider it as an improvement and not a fix.
>> > Do we have to release a 3.1 just for this improvement .... I'm not
>> sure...
>> > Do we want to wait for a 3.1 to include it ... I'm less sure ...
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Igor Fedorenko <i...@ifedorenko.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> m2e has read timeout of 60s by default (IDE is different environment,
>> >> we can't afford blocking build thread forever). There were
>> >> bugreports about this. Some corporate users reported wait times in tens
>> >> of minutes due to conservative firewall setup that fully downloads
>> >> artifacts and does antivirus scan before serving the artifact to the
>> >> client.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Igor
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 11-12-12 9:45 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> 2011/12/12 Brian Fox<bri...@infinity.nu>:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Agree.
>> >>>>> I will add it in release and complete documentation here:
>> >>>>> http://maven.apache.org/**guides/mini/guide-http-**settings.html<
>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-http-settings.html>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This seems like a pretty big change and not enough people will read
>> >>>> that and start to freak out. If maven worked all this time with no
>> >>>> read timeout, why change it now? I've never been aware of it causing a
>> >>>> problem and this is just begging for all kinds of bug reports and
>> >>>> flaming blogs.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> If any remote repository/server hang, I'm still thinking not wait
>> >>> infinitely a response from a server is a good idea and will provide a
>> >>> better user experience. (sure IMHO)
>> >>>
>> >>> BTW 60s value is maybe to small.
>> >>> What would you prefer as value ? 300s ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Note this value is the SO_TIMEOUT which is the value before receiving
>> >>> the first packet or the maximum of inactivity time between 2 packets.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> - Brett
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Brett Porter
>> >>>>>> br...@apache.org
>> >>>>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.**com/<
>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/>
>> >>>>>> http://au.linkedin.com/in/**brettporter<
>> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> >>>>>> ---------
>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<
>> dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Olivier Lamy
>> >>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>> >>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> >>>>> ---------
>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<
>> dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> >>>> ---------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<
>> dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<
>> dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to