Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:25:53 -0800 

So what you're actually saying:
Let's force people to NOT use Maven-2.1.0 of 2.2.0 by setting the prerequisite for maven to 2.2.1 
And hence, we get the Doxia verison we want.
That would solve two problems at once.

-Robert
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:47:39 +0100, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: 


On 16 January 2012 15:45, Stephen Connolly
<[email protected]> wrote:

On 15 January 2012 11:11, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote:

Le samedi 14 janvier 2012 20:22:15 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
personally i think we need to draw a line in the sand for all plugins... 
2.2.1 is the best line at the moment imho...

+1
2.1.0 and 2.2.0 are not recommended versions, and drawing a line above them 
makes our message to users that much cleaner.
the only other thing we maybe should do is roll a 2.2.2 that doesn't bomb out if 3.0.3 has pulled snapshot dependencies into the same local repo... 
is there a Jira issue for this?


Have not seen one specifically, the issue that is the RCA is
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4452

From the latest comment
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4452?focusedCommentId=285802&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-285802
you can see that 2.2.1 has issues (which I can confirm from my testing
of versions-maven-plugin in preparation of it's 1.3 release


You can also Google for:

maven-metadata-public-snapshot.xml ': expected START_TAG or END_TAG
not TEXT (position: TEXT seen

That will list all the people complaining.

To see this most easily, find your favorite Maven Plugin, using Maven
3.0.3 run "mvn clean install" on a -SNAPSHOT version
using Maven 2.2.1 run "mvn groupId:artifactId:version-SNAPSHOT:goal"
and watch the blow-up





i
may look into that myself... i think it would be fine for it to ignore that 
extra xml entries in the metadata (least change in behaviour) so only
change from 2.2.1 would be the more relaxed metadata parsing... if anyone knows any criticals i would more likely see those in a 2.2.3 or 2.3 ie i 
wouldn't be release manager for such a release ;-)

- Stephen

---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the 
screen
On 14 Jan 2012 15:45, "Robert Scholte" <[email protected]> wrote: 
> I've fixed MCHECKSTYLE-170 and tried to apply some shading.
> The separation of api/interfaces versus implementation is not done well 
> in Doxia.
> This would mean, that the shade-plugin will need a lot of configuration, 
> which also needs to be maintained if there are new Doxia-classes.
> So for plugins with only reporting-goals the requirement for Maven-2.2.1 
> seems to be the best solution.
>
> -Robert
>
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:10:45 +0100, Dennis Lundberg <[email protected]> 
>
> wrote:
>  On 2012-01-13 20:43, Robert Scholte wrote:
>>> My guess would be that with relocation it wouldn't matter.[1]
>>> I'd like to confirm this with the maven-checkstyle-plugin project,
>>> but
>>> unfortunately a lot of unit-tests are failing on my machine (win7 + 
>>> jdk6 + any M2/M3)
>>
>> I can confirm these test errors and failures on Win 7, Java 5 and
>> Maven
>> 2.2.1/3.0.3.
>>
>> On Ubuntu with Java 5 and Maven 2.2.1/3.0.3 it works though.
>>
>> Created an issue in JIRA to track it:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MCHECKSTYLE-170<http://jira.codehaus 
>> .org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-170>>>
>>  -Robert
>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://maven.apache.org/**plugins/maven-shade-plugin/**
>>> examples/class-relocation.html<http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven 
>>> -shade-plugin/examples/class-relocation.html>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:59:36 +0100, Dennis Lundberg
>>> <[email protected]>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>  Hi
>>>
>>>> Can it work? I haven't had much experience with shading, but I was 
>>>> under the impression that it is a way to hide classes from
>>>> Maven's class loader. What we really want in this case is a way
>>>> to *insert* newer versions of classes into Maven's class loader.
>>>> Don't know if that can be done...
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-01-12 00:12, Robert Scholte wrote:
>>>>> What about plugins containing both build and report goals?
>>>>> If the suggested shading of Doxia will work, I'd prefer that
>>>>> option.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Robert
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:53:57 +0100, Barrie Treloar
>>>>> <[email protected]>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>  On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Stephen Connolly
>>>>>
>>>>>> <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.**com
>>>>>> <[email protected]>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> [email protected].**org<[email protected]
>>>>>> he.org> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>> [email protected].**org<[email protected]
>>>>> .org> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> [email protected].**org<[email protected] 
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**-------- 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected].**org<[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to