On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
<akurt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chris Graham" <chrisgw...@gmail.com>
>> To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 1:42:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: RPMs for Maven 3?
>>
>> I would also point out that the plugins do not need packaging, as
>> maven will download them. Only the base distribution needs to be
>> RPM'd.
>
> Well, there are variety of cases when builds are required to happen offline 
> in which case having the plugins packaged is mandatory. Not for every use 
> case but this needs to be pointed out too.

True. I'm am trying to set up a self-contained build environment but
we have Maven supported repositories on-site so I'm going to assume
that we can store any plugins there, the idea being that we configure
things such that only the local repositories will be queried. I'd hate
to duplicate the packaging infrastructure that's already present and
working.

Thanks,
Jos

>
> Alex
>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 16/03/2012, at 9:46 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
>> <sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Quoting Jos Backus (2012-03-15 21:04:00)
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm trying to install Maven 3 in automatically generated CentOS VM
>> >> images, and having Maven 3 and plugins available as RPMs would
>> >> help
>> >> greatly with this effort.
>> >>
>> >> How hard would it be to augment the CI setup that creates the
>> >> Maven
>> >> packages today to also generate RPMs for RHEL/CentOS? Perhaps the
>> >> Maven RPM plugin (http://mojo.codehaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/) can
>> >> be
>> >> used for this purpose?
>> >>
>> >> I looked at jpackage.org but the latest Maven version there is too
>> >> old (2.0.7).
>> >
>> > Depending on your needs for using exact upstream (meaning Apache)
>> > version or not you *might* have luck trying to use Fedora binary
>> > rpms on
>> > your CentOS machine. I haven't tried this, but with a 1 or 2
>> > rebuilds it
>> > might work. You'd have to create your own rpm repo for this
>> > probably and
>> > do a few tweaks here and there. Biggest issue would probably be
>> > that
>> > some of our current binary rpms in F17 and rawhide are built using
>> > OpenJDK 7 with target set to 1.7 so you won't be able to use them
>> > with
>> > 1.6 VM.
>> >
>> > We do have 3.0.4 currently and quite a few plugins, but if you go
>> > this
>> > way I'd suggest to ask questions on <java-devel at
>> > lists.fedoraproject.org>.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni...@redhat.com>
>> > Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
>> >
>> > PGP: 7B087241
>> > Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>



-- 
Jos Backus
jos at catnook.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to