The JIRA report should go into the doxia sub-site (and corresponding
doxia-sitetools, etc), then you link to that from the base site for each
sub-project. WDYT?
-Lukas
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
notice that I tried to commit improvements based on previous thoughts and
found in index.apt.vm the following link: {{{./jira-report.html}Release Notes
for ${doxiaVersion}}}
And since the Jira report isn't available in Doxia "base" site, if you simply
remove the actual JIRA report from Doxia site, we're stuck: we need to add the
report to Doxia "base" and publish it (either manually for 1.2 or wait for
1.3)
Regards
Hervé
Le mercredi 28 mars 2012 07:11:00 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
The Doxia site expert is Vincent Siveton: I hope he can express his opinion
Doxia (base + sitetools + tools) deserves IMHO the dedicated menus from the
actual Doxia site [1] to let people understand: it can/should be improved,
but if we merge the Doxia site with regular Maven site, we loose this
dedicated menu: I don't think this will help.
But you're right with the JIRA report being inappropriate: Doxia site
doesn't cover only Doxia base, which is [2].
I'm sure that this menu could be made more explicit to help people
understand the relation between Doxia site and each 3 components: removing
the JIRA configuration is the first step.
Since infra hasn't problems with having a few number of sub-sites being
treated as dedicated CMS site, I don't see any problem with maintaining
Doxia site.
To sum up:
- +1 to JIRA configuration removel from Doxia site
- -1 to merging into Maven regular site
Regards,
Hervé
[1] http://maven.apache.org/doxia/index.html
[2] http://maven.apache.org/doxia/doxia/index.html
Le lundi 26 mars 2012 22:13:17 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
Hi
When I saw some of the commits by Hervé on the CMS integration it hit
me: Why do we have a separate site module for the Doxia site?
Unless there are any difficult technical hurdles standing in the way,
why don't we just merge it into the regular Maven site?
I had a quick look at the POM and the only odd things in there is a
configuration snippet for doxia-maven-plugin that is injected into the
generated site somewhere, as well as creating some output files (RTF and
PDF) from a Doxia book example which are then copied to the generated
site using maven-antrun-plugin.
There's also a JIRA report in the Doxia site, which in my opinion is
wrong since Doxia is not one project anymore but rather an umbrella like
Plugins or Shared. So the solution would be to remove the report from
the site and add it to the project sites of Doxia, Doxia Site Tools and
Doxia Tools.
Thoughts?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
