Just to clarify additionally: There are existing read-only clones of a lot of our projects (i'm sure infra can make the rest if they have value)
Some of these are excellent and of high quality (surefire, m3 + it's are the ones I know of) while at least maven-plugins is useless (due to a strange interpretation of tags - try checking out a tag in the current maven-plugins git clone !!!). So we need to collect the assessments of which repos are "migration ready" and which are not. Any community input on this would be great! (If you've used the clone and find that tags/branches etc work according to expectations we're cool) For those that are migration ready the process is is something like this: 1. Have infra make the existing read-only mirror the official master. 2. Change scm url in pom 3. Update github mirroring url (file issue with github) 4. Celebrate For those that for /some/ reason are not ready, we need to resolve what needs to be done. Kristian 2012/9/12 Baptiste MATHUS <m...@batmat.net>: > Hi, > > +1. > Though I'm volunteering to help, as I'm not Maven committer, I don't know > if I'm really allowed to help. > I could help on some projects if needed (I can see maybe enforcer & release > for example). > > By the way, I'm not sure how this is supposed to work. After reading > Kristian comment, I discovered there's actually already many (if not all) > Maven projects that seem migrated (?). > http://git.apache.org/ Is this something that was done by someone during > the night? :-). > > Or maybe that repos are not correct in some way (Kristian's comment say > some are already usable as-is)? > > What makes a repo correct or not to be used as-is? > > Looking at the repo structure from the HTTP interface, I'm under the > impression this is a git repo created by git svn (or svn2git?), . > My naive first guess understanding is that there already may be a batch of > "maven git scripts" running on the infrastructure that would git-svn the > main repo, then filter-branch this repo for a bunch of directories > (release, enforcer, etc.). > > If this is so, not totally sure what would be left? > > Thanks. > > 2012/9/12 Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > >> Who is going to open the initial negotiation with INFRA? >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Hi Folks, >> > So the vote passed, now it's time for volunteers to use their fingers >> :-). >> > I have started a page [1] for ETA of migration (note the Volunteer >> > column :-) ) and for discussion on some stuff (plugins shared) >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > -- >> > Olivier Lamy >> > Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migration >> >> -- >> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net >> Sauvez un arbre, >> Mangez un castor ! >> nbsp;! >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migration> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
