I agree but sincerely I'm sure that less than 0,01% of our users will customize their logs.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: > > In any case doing a choice nowadays for 3.1.0 won't prevent us to change > it > > in the future. I really hope that the ability to switch from a logger > > implementation to another won't require several days of developments or I > > really missed something about it. > > > > Well, very likely it would affect the end users as the logger configuration > would be different. And that could be confusing and also have people > convert their adapted logger config files. > > /Anders > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Arnaud > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > Le samedi 1 décembre 2012 09:17:52 Arnaud Héritier a écrit : > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > > > > > Couldn't we have a look at olamy's log4j2 branch to see if we could > > > > sanitize / merge it to propose at least one change for the end user > > > > and demonstrate the interest of the change about logs : a colorized > > > > console. > > > > > > > > I remember you did that in mvnsh/teslashell a long time ago (as an > > > > extension ?) and perhaps it could be easy to add properly this > feature > > > > in 3.1.0 (otherwise it won't be before a 3.2.0). > > > > > > > > Myself I'm using a 3.1.0 fork with this patch and I' m really > > > > satisfied (it's so good to quickly see highlighted warning and errors > > > > ). I merged it back in the last 3.1.0 tag you did without issue > > > > > > > > Wdyt? > > > > > > > > --------- > > > > Arnaud > > > > > > > > Le 1 déc. 2012 à 00:20, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > I'm done with the issues that cropped up so I'm ready to re-spin > > 3.1.0. > > > > > > > > > > Anyone want to add anything or discuss anything before I spin this? > > I'm > > > > > not in any rush so if folks want to talk about logging we can. But > > > given > > > > > the fact once SLF4J initializes it can't change the implementation > > > > > plugins integrating with Maven need to use the implementation we > > > choose. > > > > > This is how everything else in the world that integrates SLF4J has > to > > > > > operate so I don't really see us being any different. > > > > > > > > > > I'll wait until tomorrow to re-spin. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Jason van Zyl > > > > > Founder & CTO, Sonatype > > > > > Founder, Apache Maven > > > > > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ----- > > Arnaud Héritier > > http://aheritier.net > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
