On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > If we ever got that far, I would argue pretty strenuously against a > PMC-level rejection of something just based on being EPL. A class-B > license is a perfectly legitimate dependency. As would I. If we were talking about binding our apis against a class-B, I might feel different, but we aren't. We're talking about using SLF4J as the api and logback as the implementation. If someone needs to come along and use a different logger impl, is it that big of a deal? I'd like to hear from someone who does Linux repackaging of Maven on this topic...
