2013/2/7 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>:
> On Thursday, 7 February 2013, Nicolas Delsaux wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > As we are now in 2013, it's probably time to think about that (again).
>> >
>> > Reading [1], even 1.6 won't be anymore updated after feb 2013.
>> >
>> > Can we say we are safe to go to 1.6 as minimum required ?
>> >
>> Don't fully understand the question.
>> Do you mean .... using 1.6 to compile maven ? or 1.6 to run maven ? or
>
>
> This vote is for both of the above
Read my first email, it's not a vote.
I just wanted to hear opinions before start a vote or not.
BTW due to various responses I won't :-).
>
>
>> 1.6 as default version for maven-compiler-plugin ?
>>
>>
> Well we stated previously that once a version of maven-compiler-plugin
> *requires* 1.6 to run (though will keep forking down to compile with older
> javac via toolchains support) that we'd change the default target and
> source to 1.6, so I suspect that vote would follow soonish after
>
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas Delsaux
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>>
>>



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to