On Mar 3, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As I see it, you are using the version number to communicate with the
> tiny number of people who have made plugins that depend on Aether.
> 

Any JSR330 discrepancies, SLF4J being used for logging and the Aether changes. 
4.0.0 says "we did our best to make everything work, but you may have issues."

> I would rather see us use the version number to communicate with the
> vast number of people who use Maven.
> 

How do you see this as not communicating with everyone. JSR330, SLF4J, and 
Eclipse Aether are not insignificant.

> So, I'd switch to Eclipse Aether, including the need to fork a few
> plugins, as 3.2, and use the number 4.0.0 for a version that has real
> user-visible impact and value.
> 

I see JSR330, SLF4J and Eclipse Aether as valuable.

> If you presented a long list of wonderful user-visible improvements
> that would result from the adoption of the new Aether, I'd be happier
> with your proposal.
> 

I have no long use of user-visible improvements because I'm the only one 
working on the core. There's only so much I'm willing to do and I won't develop 
any features until I know they will be used.

> 
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mar 3, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> A quick answer whilst I let my thoughts dwell on the full long post..
>>> 
>>> If we're jumping to a major release here, is this a viable time to also 
>>> update the schema and address of the things we've long been wanting there? 
>>> ( mixins of some form ) - or is this out of scope ( of this discussion at 
>>> least ).
>>> 
>> 
>> To me it's out of scope. I want to get the API changes out there and signal 
>> the potential of major API breakages. Features can be rolled out whenever. 
>> To me the change in versions is to signal API breakage, not feature addition.
>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> No one seems to object to doing a release with the SLF4J support without 
>>>> the isolation so I wanted to discuss what happens when we integrate 
>>>> Eclipse Aether and suggest an alternate release path.
>>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Jason
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Jason van Zyl
>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> the course of true love never did run smooth ...
>> 
>> -- Shakespeare
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mar 3, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> A quick answer whilst I let my thoughts dwell on the full long post..
>>> 
>>> If we're jumping to a major release here, is this a viable time to also 
>>> update the schema and address of the things we've long been wanting there? 
>>> ( mixins of some form ) - or is this out of scope ( of this discussion at 
>>> least ).
>>> 
>> 
>> To me it's out of scope. I want to get the API changes out there and signal 
>> the potential of major API breakages. Features can be rolled out whenever. 
>> To me the change in versions is to signal API breakage, not feature addition.
>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> No one seems to object to doing a release with the SLF4J support without 
>>>> the isolation so I wanted to discuss what happens when we integrate 
>>>> Eclipse Aether and suggest an alternate release path.
>>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Jason
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Jason van Zyl
>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> the course of true love never did run smooth ...
>> 
>> -- Shakespeare
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> 

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder & CTO, Sonatype
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------

To do two things at once is to do neither.
 
 -- Publilius Syrus, Roman slave, first century B.C.





Reply via email to