Me:
Linux, Windows, AIX (and if I have too, OS/2!) 1.4, 5, 6 and if I need it,
I can get 7.



On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jore...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I rum mainly on OSX for client and some Linuxes for server - so client
> side is >= JDK 1.6
>
> // vänlig hälsning,
> // [sw: "best regards"],
> //
> // Lennart Jörelid
>
> 16 jul 2013 kl. 13:53 skrev Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
>
> > perso osx. So only >= 1.6
> >
> >
> > 2013/7/16 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>:
> >> Speaking as a Maven Developer...
> >>
> >> My primary development machine is OS-X.
> >>
> >> On that machine I have 1.6.0_24-b07-334, 1.7.0_17, 1.7.0_21, and
> 1.7.0_25
> >>
> >> I have a personal linode running 1.6.0_22, and my famous Acer Aspire One
> >> that has some Java 1.5 and 1.6 versions on it... but I have not turned
> it
> >> on more than twice since March 2011... most likely I will wipe it and
> >> reinstall some more recent linux on it which will remove the older JDK
> >> versions leaving it with likely a 1.6 and a 1.7.
> >>
> >> I also have a windows box sitting beside me... powered off (the Sun
> Ultra
> >> T-20's are noisy don't you know) I only turn it on when I *need* windows
> >> and a virtual machine will not suffice (i.e. firmware updates on Samsung
> >> Galaxy S... which is now only used as a game console by my son) That has
> >> Java 1.4-1.7 on it but it is far from current in terms of AV and
> patches,
> >> so not something I would turn on for a quick test of a release.
> >>
> >> Effectively the lowest I can test releases is Java 1.6.
> >>
> >> It would be interesting to hear what the rest of the committers have as
> >> their testing capability. If very few committers have access to Java 1.5
> >> across operating systems then I think the answer is clear... namely we
> >> would not be in a position to stand over a release that claims to work
> on
> >> Java 1.5, and hence moving to Java 1.6 as a baseline would seem a good
> idea.
> >>
> >> Tools like animal-sniffer are great to help developers who cannot set up
> >> the older JVMs on their development environment... but in my experience
> >> they are no substitute for running on the older JVM.
> >>
> >> If our test capability is basically the Windows/Java 1.5 slave and the
> >> *nix/Java 1.5 slave on the Apache Jenkins build server *and* we cannot
> keep
> >> that integration test suite passing *then* Java 1.5 is dead for Maven
> IMHO
> >>
> >> -Stephen
> >>
> >>
> >> On 16 July 2013 11:58, Robert Patrick <robert.patr...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Oracle Java 5 and 6 are EOLed but Oracle continues to support customers
> >>> using commercial products that require them that themselves are not
> EOLed.
> >>> Given that current versions of Maven support Java 5 and 6, the real
> >>> question is how important is it for older applications that cannot
> support
> >>> Java 7 to be able to use future versions of Maven?
> >>>
> >>> As far as I know, there is nothing from preventing Maven developers
> from
> >>> using the existing versions of JDK 5/6 to build and test Maven.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Robert Patrick <robert.patr...@oracle.com>
> >>> VP, FMW Architects Team: The A-Team
> >>> Oracle Corporation                      Office: +1.940.725.0011
> >>> 1148 Triple Crown Court         Fax: +1.940.725.0012
> >>> Bartonville, TX 76226, USA              Mobile: +1.469.556.9450
> >>>
> >>> Professional Oracle WebLogic Server
> >>> by Robert Patrick, Gregory Nyberg, and Philip Aston
> >>> with Josh Bregman and Paul Done
> >>> Book Home Page: http://www.wrox.com/
> >>> Kindle Version: http://www.amazon.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:47 AM
> >>> To: Maven Developers List
> >>> Subject: Re: Java version usage survey
> >>>
> >>> I've put a question on Stack Overflow:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17671899/when-is-java-6-end-of-life-in-the-context-of-writing-developer-toolsto
> >>> see if we can get something that is a bit more focus on facts.
> >>>
> >>> e.g. we are all OSS developers: thus premium/extended/sustaining
> support
> >>> contracts are outside our budget. If we cannot test it for free, we
> cannot
> >>> support it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 16 July 2013 09:01, Fred Cooke <fred.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> My 2c:
> >>>>
> >>>>   - J7 on Mac is unstable (trust me...) and non-performant, and thus I
> >>>>   require my users to use Apple's J6 on the Mac.
> >>>>   - On Linux there are lots of Swing bugs in all versions, but a lot
> >>> less
> >>>>   in J7 than J6, so I recommend J7 for Linux guys.
> >>>>   - I don't use J5 for anything at all and none of my code can run on
> it
> >>>>   due to basics that are missing there.
> >>>>
> >>>> I didn't distinguish vendors because the comments apply across all of
> >>>> them anyway.
> >>>> Fred.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Arnaud.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You need to at least add an OTHER (ie non oracle) entry as well. You
> >>>>> you can track Oracle java 6 and Non-Oracle java 6.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Chris
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Arnaud Héritier
> >>>>> <aherit...@gmail.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Good point. I updated the survey to tell it is the Oracle JDK EOL
> >>>>>> Survey :
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Jqxq2KgSricwS7YV7pmWvHA8m7_TE7c8Jhusu
> >>>> gPmGW4/viewform
> >>>>>> Replies :
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Jqxq2KgSricwS7YV7pmWvHA8m7_TE7c8Jhusu
> >>>> gPmGW4/viewanalytics
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Chris Graham
> >>>>>> <chrisgw...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Arnaud Héritier <
> >>>> aherit...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  Java 6 EOL was in feb and Maven and its plugins are always
> >>>>> compatible
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Oracle Java 6 was EOL'd.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> IBM Java 6 was, and is not due to be for a few more years. They
> >>>>>>> even
> >>>>>>> *extended* 1.5's life for a year. Sept this year, I think.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Chris
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> -----
> >>>>>> Arnaud Héritier
> >>>>>> http://aheritier.net
> >>>>>> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Olivier Lamy
> > Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to